Parashat Vayishlach

Shabbat Table Talk

Parashat Vayishlach Erev Shabbat 23 November 2018

Week of 18-24 November 2018

Torah portion: Genesis 32:4 – 36:43   Haftarah: Obadiah 1:1-21

Theme: The Spirituality of a Journey


 

Download

 

The primary interest in this parashah is השיבת ‘עקב, Jacob’s return from Paddan-aram and his twenty years in service of his uncle, Laban, to Kiriath-arba (Mamre, Hebron) where his father, Isaac, now approaching 180, is dying. We can discern here elements of the spirituality of this journey. We might set aside chapter 36, which interrupts Jacob’s story with its review of the descendants of Esau, concluding with “he is Edom.” The Stone edition states: “In this genealogy lay the roots of Edom … the perpetual enemy of Israel” [p. 89]. In the haftarah, Obadiah envisions the disaster that will befall Edom.

 

The spirituality of Jacob’s journey merits attention. As our parashah begins, Jacob has escaped from Laban’s service, and has even celebrated the peaceful resolution of his unexpected encounter with Laban, who pursued him as far as Mount Gilead. They go their separate ways. Arriving at Mahanaim, Jacob must deal with his dread of an anticipated confrontation with Esau. He sends gifts in advance, with the message that “I have sojourned [גרת‘] with Laban” and that he is now seeking Esau’s favor. Rashi comments that “the numerical value of גרת’ equals 613,” which he interprets as: Jacob “has observed the divine commandments”; he has not adopted Laban’s ways” [Stone, p. 79]. Yet, his own righteousness is not a secure refuge for Jacob; he has “sojourned,” he has moved on, beyond the birthright issue, but has Esau?

 

News of Esau’s approach evokes great fear in Jacob. He resorts to four tactics: 1) strategic planning to cut his losses: dividing his possessions to secure at least half; 2) prayer: remembering God’s promise, “Return to your land and your relatives, and I will do good with you,” Jacob admits his fear, and pleads for rescue; 3) appeasement: dispatching to Esau substantial tributes of herds; 4) the mysterious wrestling incident: alone, at night, Jacob, consciously or subconsciously engages in the struggle that transforms  his identity from Jacob [usurper] to Israel [one who “has striven with God and men and has prevailed”].

 

The encounter with Esau occupies just 18 verses [Chapter 33]. They part company peacefully, Esau to Seir, Jacob to Succoth. For Jacob, the dreaded encounter with his brother is over. He arrives in Canaan intact/שלם — physically recovered, financially prosperous, affirmed in his faith [cf. Tanach, Rashi note, p.82].

 

Chapter 34 provides another perspective on Jacob through his sons’ response to the rape of Dina. Jacob challenges his sons, Shimeon and Levi, on their violent revenge, pointing out the damage they have done to the family’s reputation as they enter Canaan. The sons maintain their attitude, “Should he treat our sister like a harlot?” Theirs was a principled yet brutal response, and Jacob reprimands it.

 

Jacob arrives in Beth-El, the place of his earlier dream of the ladder, and God appears to him again, confirming his name, Israel, and disclosing his own name “El-Shaddai,” a significant new step in Jacob’s relation with God. Rachel dies on the road to Ephrath and, finally, at Kiriath-arba, Isaac’s death brings Jacob and Esau together again, to bury him, and with this the patriarchal succession passes to Jacob.

 

For Reflection and Discussion: 1. Identify and reflect on two events in your own present journey in faith and indicate how those have shaped your spirituality. 2. Of the above events in Jacob’s journey, which speaks most to you? How?

 

Bibliography: Tanach, The Stone Edition, Mesorah Publications (New York, 1998), Brown, Fitzmeyer, Murphy, The New Jerome Biblical Commentary, Prentice Hall (New Jersey, 1990).

 

This week’s teaching commentary is by

Diane Willey, NDS, M.A. in Theology, Saskatoon, Canada, Bat Kol Alum 2005, 2006
Email address: dianewilley@hotmail.com

[Copyright © 2018]

 

.……………………………………………………

PLEASE NOTE: The weekly Parashah commentaries represent the research and creative thought of their authors, and are meant to stimulate deeper thinking about the meaning of the Scriptures. While they draw upon the study methods and sources employed by the Bat Kol Institute, the views and conclusions expressed in these commentaries are solely those of their authors, and do not necessarily represent the views of Bat Kol.   The commentaries, along with all materials published on the Bat Kol website, are copyrighted by the writers, and are made available for personal and group study, and local church purposes. Permission needed for other purposes.  Questions, comments and feedback are always welcome.

………………………………………………………

 

Bat Kol Institute for Jewish Studies, Jerusalem

~~19832018~~

Christians Studying the Bible within its Jewish milieu, using Jewish Sources.

Website: www.batkol.info;   Parashah Admin: gill@batkol.info

@import url(https://www.ratisbonne.org.il/bk/wp-content/plugins/siteorigin-panels/css/front-flex.min.css); #pgc-4478-0-0 , #pgc-4478-0-2 { width:10%;width:calc(10% – ( 0.9 * 30px ) ) } #pgc-4478-0-1 { width:80%;width:calc(80% – ( 0.2 * 30px ) ) } #pl-4478 #panel-4478-0-1-0 { } #pl-4478 .so-panel { margin-bottom:30px } #pl-4478 .so-panel:last-child { margin-bottom:0px } #pg-4478-0.panel-no-style, #pg-4478-0.panel-has-style > .panel-row-style { -webkit-align-items:flex-start;align-items:flex-start } @media (max-width:780px){ #pg-4478-0.panel-no-style, #pg-4478-0.panel-has-style > .panel-row-style { -webkit-flex-direction:column;-ms-flex-direction:column;flex-direction:column } #pg-4478-0 .panel-grid-cell { margin-right:0 } #pg-4478-0 .panel-grid-cell { width:100% } #pgc-4478-0-0 , #pgc-4478-0-1 { margin-bottom:30px } #pl-4478 .panel-grid-cell { padding:0 } #pl-4478 .panel-grid .panel-grid-cell-empty { display:none } #pl-4478 .panel-grid .panel-grid-cell-mobile-last { margin-bottom:0px } }

Parashat Vayetzei

Shabbat Table Talk

Parashat Vayetzei –Erev Shabbat 16 November 2018

 Week of 11-17  November, 2018)

Torah Portion: Genesis 28.10-32.3   Haftarah: Hosea 12.13-14.10

Theme: G-d’s commitment remains, even when we escape


Download 

 

It is quite interesting to see the framing of the narrative in our Torah portion that begins and ends with Jacob’s escapes (vayetzei). Let us look at the nuances at play in the portion and connect this with the Haftarah in Hosea.

 

Jacob escapes the possible wrath he will likely face because he took advantage his father and brother’s vulnerability. He “took away” the respect and rights from them, respectively. Now Jacob has reached Beer-Sheba and Haran. These places prepare the readers for what will unfold in the entire narrative. Beer-Sheba can mean “sevenfold oath”, which indeed Jacob received seven promises from the L-rd enumerated in 28.13-15. Similarly, Haran can mean “crossroads”, which is a circumstance in which Jacob finds himself at present. He later named the place Beth-El, which was formerly Luz. Jacob escapes before the sight of his sightless father and gullible brother, and here Jacob realizes that G-d was in that place, at each moment; and such reality “escapes from his sight” (this is Luz’ meaning). He was afraid (yare) of both realities, which were the deceit he did and the Divine before him. To his thoughts, he surely does not deserve such providential benefit. Hosea’s call might reverberate to Jacob’s senses, both of fear and fascination, “Where are your scourges, Sheol? Compassion will be banished from my sight!” (Hos 13.14) Yet, Jacob sustains himself throughout the years, holding to G-d’s promises, until his return.

 

Along the crossroads of Jacob’s life were blessings such as his wives  and children, as well as struggles namely the endless cheating made by his father-in-law, Laban. Through the years, Jacob felt that he is being “robbed” by his father-in-law, which seems a cycle to some degree of what he did in the past towards his own sightless father. He now knows the feeling, the possible pain or agony of whom he wronged. It is possible that through the years, Jacob has matured and has gained courage to face those whom he “robbed” of their rights. Perhaps, Jacob sensed within him G-d’s words through Hosea, “Israel, come back to Yah your God.” (Hos 14.1) Even with these words, one thing that Jacob seems to carry with him and must come to terms with, this is his deepest fear, from guilt and loss. Though driven by fear (gazal) that he will be again “robbed” by Laban, not only of the things he worked hard for, but this includes his own family. Hence, Jacob decided at that moment to escape (vayetzei), together with his wives, children, servants and flock. But, he was intercepted by Laban. The two later made a covenant, and Jacob was left “free” by Laban with his entire family and flock. On his way, just like the beginning, Jacob encounters angels, thus he named the place Mahanaim, which means, “a place of boarder” or “crossroad”. His journey is not yet done; something is waiting for him at the end that remains unsure. However, one thing is sure, and that is G-d fulfilled his promise. G-d remains true to his commitment, even if we fail, surely G-d will not fail or fail us.

 

Reflection and Discussion: 1. Have you experienced the cycle of your unjust action towards another? How did you realize that such struggle, pain, agony, or misfortune, is similar to a certain degree, of the wrong you did to another? 2. Just like Jacob, have you made peace with your past? What is the effect of this to you today? 3. Are you still in an “escape mode” from the reality you have now? Or what is it in your present that you find difficult to face? Why? How can the people around you help you?

 

This week’s Parashat Vayetzei Commentary was prepared by

Kristine Meneses, Ph.D., Philippines.  Bat Kol Alumna 2016

Email address: krstn.rw@gmail.com

[Copyright © 2018]

 

…………………………………………………………………………

PLEASE NOTE: The weekly Parashah commentaries represent the research and creative thought of their authors, and are meant to stimulate deeper thinking about the meaning of the Scriptures. While they draw upon the study methods and sources employed by the Bat Kol Institute, the views and conclusions expressed in these commentaries are solely those of their authors, and do not necessarily represent the views of Bat Kol. The commentaries, along with all materials published on the Bat Kol website, are copyrighted by the writers, and are made available for personal and group study, and local church purposes. Permission needed for other purposes. Questions, comments and feedback are always welcome.

…………………………………………………………………………

 

Bat Kol Institute for Jewish Studies, Jerusalem

1983-2018

“Christians Studying the Bible within its Jewish milieu, using Jewish Sources.”

Website: www.batkol.info;   Parashah Admin: gill@batkol.info

@import url(https://www.ratisbonne.org.il/bk/wp-content/plugins/siteorigin-panels/css/front-flex.min.css); #pgc-4449-0-0 , #pgc-4449-0-2 { width:10%;width:calc(10% – ( 0.9 * 30px ) ) } #pgc-4449-0-1 { width:80%;width:calc(80% – ( 0.2 * 30px ) ) } #pl-4449 #panel-4449-0-1-0 { } #pl-4449 .so-panel { margin-bottom:30px } #pl-4449 .so-panel:last-child { margin-bottom:0px } #pg-4449-0.panel-no-style, #pg-4449-0.panel-has-style > .panel-row-style { -webkit-align-items:flex-start;align-items:flex-start } @media (max-width:780px){ #pg-4449-0.panel-no-style, #pg-4449-0.panel-has-style > .panel-row-style { -webkit-flex-direction:column;-ms-flex-direction:column;flex-direction:column } #pg-4449-0 .panel-grid-cell { margin-right:0 } #pg-4449-0 .panel-grid-cell { width:100% } #pgc-4449-0-0 , #pgc-4449-0-1 { margin-bottom:30px } #pl-4449 .panel-grid-cell { padding:0 } #pl-4449 .panel-grid .panel-grid-cell-empty { display:none } #pl-4449 .panel-grid .panel-grid-cell-mobile-last { margin-bottom:0px } }

Parashat Toledot

Shabbat Table Talk

Parashat Toledot Erev Shabbat 9 November 2018

Week of 4-10 November 2018

Torah portion: Genesis 25:19-28:9   Haftarah: Malachi 1:1-2:7

Theme: Isaac


 

Download

 

Chapter 26 of Genesis is the only chapter devoted exclusively to Isaac. You know, that patriarch that people often have difficulties to remember. The character who is mostly remembered either by his father trying to sacrifice him or by his son tricking him. The figure who is always in the background. In this chapter he is finally his own man. He is a man of action: he leaves the place where he was born and settles elsewhere; he is exposed to the risk of losing his wife; he is the target of the Philistine envy; he is childless, but then has two sons who are very different from each other.

 

But wait! Have we not heard about all these events before? We have: these are all the same things that happened to his father Abraham. As Ginzberg writes “The life of Isaac was a faithful reflex of the life of his father.” (Ginzberg, 259.) Even though chapter 26 is about Isaac, we are constantly reminded that he was the son of Abraham (verses 3, 15, 18, 24). It seems that Isaac’s main role is to be the link between different “generations” (toledot in Hebrew) that carries on God’s promise.

 

There is one activity that is particularly emphasized in Genesis 26: digging of wells. Wells had featured in Isaac’s life before: Abraham’s servant met his future wife at a well (Gen.24:11) and then Isaac himself met Rebecca after he had visited the “Well of the Living One Who Sees Me” or Beer-Lahai-Roi in Hebrew (Gen.24:62). Isaac and his servants reopen the wells dug by his father and rename them the old names (including Beersheba, see Gen.21:31). But he also has his own discoveries of living streams and deeper waters. It is no wonder that in the Jewish tradition Isaac has come down as a quiet man of reflection who digs deep for meanings and relationships both with men and with God, even if it is not obvious to a casual observer.

 

Isaac is all of us who cannot boast about extraordinary circumstances and heroic achievements. But that does not mean that we are less worthy of God’s promises and blessings. Isaac is crucial in creating a link between generations of active and famous people. But he is not just that, he is also the necessary link to continue God’s presence in this world through peace, humility and the courage to always dig deeper.

 

For Reflection and Discussion: [1] Are you more like Abraham or like Isaac? Reflect on the importance of them both in the biblical story and our lives. [2] Reflect on other passages in the Bible featured by a well or a stream. How are they similar or dissimilar to the story of Isaac? [3] I encourage you to read the reflection on Toledot by Rabbi Kligler, see http://lsi-wjc.org/toldot-isaac-digs-his-fathers-wells-anew  Reflect on God’s name Mekor Mayim Chayim, “The Source of Living Waters.”

 

Bibliography:  Ginzberg, Legends of the Jews (Philadelphia, 1956)

 

This week’s teaching commentary is by

Rota Stone, M.Litt., New Zealand and Bat Kol alum 2002, 2003
Email address: rotina@runbox.com

[Copyright © 2018]

 

………………………………………………………

PLEASE NOTE: The weekly Parashah commentaries represent the research and creative thought of their authors, and are meant to stimulate deeper thinking about the meaning of the Scriptures. While they draw upon the study methods and sources employed by the Bat Kol Institute, the views and conclusions expressed in these commentaries are solely those of their authors, and do not necessarily represent the views of Bat Kol. The commentaries, along with all materials published on the Bat Kol website, are copyrighted by the writers, and are made available for personal and group study, and local church purposes. Permission needed for other purposes. Questions, comments and feedback are always welcome.

………………………………………………

 

Bat Kol Institute for Jewish Studies, Jerusalem

~~19832018~~

Christians Studying the Bible within its Jewish milieu, using Jewish Sources.

Website: www.batkol.info;   Parashah Admin: gill@batkol.info

@import url(https://www.ratisbonne.org.il/bk/wp-content/plugins/siteorigin-panels/css/front-flex.min.css); #pgc-4421-0-0 , #pgc-4421-0-2 { width:10%;width:calc(10% – ( 0.9 * 30px ) ) } #pgc-4421-0-1 { width:80%;width:calc(80% – ( 0.2 * 30px ) ) } #pl-4421 #panel-4421-0-1-0 { } #pl-4421 .so-panel { margin-bottom:30px } #pl-4421 .so-panel:last-child { margin-bottom:0px } #pg-4421-0.panel-no-style, #pg-4421-0.panel-has-style > .panel-row-style { -webkit-align-items:flex-start;align-items:flex-start } @media (max-width:780px){ #pg-4421-0.panel-no-style, #pg-4421-0.panel-has-style > .panel-row-style { -webkit-flex-direction:column;-ms-flex-direction:column;flex-direction:column } #pg-4421-0 .panel-grid-cell { margin-right:0 } #pg-4421-0 .panel-grid-cell { width:100% } #pgc-4421-0-0 , #pgc-4421-0-1 { margin-bottom:30px } #pl-4421 .panel-grid-cell { padding:0 } #pl-4421 .panel-grid .panel-grid-cell-empty { display:none } #pl-4421 .panel-grid .panel-grid-cell-mobile-last { margin-bottom:0px } }

Parashat Chayai Sarah

Shabbat Table Talk

Parashat Chayai Sarah – Erev Shabbat 2 November 2018

Week of 28 October – 3 November 2018

Torah portion: Gen. 23:1-25:18 Haftarah: 1 Kings 1:1-31


 

Download

 

We begin this portion with the death of Sarah, the first Matriarch, despite the fact that Chayai Sarah means the “life of Sarah”. Sarah is said to have died at 127 years of natural causes. In the Midrash, her death seems to follow the near sacrifice (akedah) of her only son, Isaac, by her husband Abraham… She was grief stricken. Sarah believes that the sacrifice of Isaac is wrong and she doesn’t believe that G-d would command such an act. She values and sees that loving relationships are the ultimate test of morality, faith and the G-d of the Covenant. Sarah may be seen here as the greater hero to her husband who is willing to sacrifice his only son in obedience to divine command. (Shapiro, 71) How could he obey a G-d calling for human sacrifice? Carol Gillian, psychologist, has spoken of the difference between men and women in that women often define themselves in the context of human relationships. They are “nurturer, caretaker, help mate, weaver of networks for men.” Men too often devalue that care. (Shapiro, 72) Abraham appears unsatisfied with his normal life and seeks a higher truth and meaning. He is the “star gazer” in scripture but often fails in looking for justice in his own home. (Perhaps this understanding comes later as the prophet Hosea says “it is mercy I desire and not sacrifices.” (6:6).

 

After Sarah’s death, Abraham secures a plot from the Canaanites to bury her in the land of Hebron. He marries again and fathers more children. Genesis 25:7 gives the length of his life as 175 years. With the death of Sarah, Abraham somehow finds himself understanding her value on relationships that are lasting and meaningful in responding to G-d. He finds that his vision of life is now more humble, real, human. He finds this reality with his family and his concern in finding a good wife for his son, Isaac. His care of his children and his daily life become a holy life without seeking past memories of “mountaintop talks” with G-d. He recognizes Sarah’s wisdom, truth, and the value of the long life he and Sarah shared together. Her life was a blessing indeed. The passage from Genesis continues this theme of relationships as it speaks of Sarah’s burial and aged Abraham looking for a secure future for his family with finding a wife for Isaac.

 

In the Kings reading we find the aged King David also seeking to secure his future heir after his 40 year reign with keeping a promise he made to Bathsheba to name her son, Solomon as his successor. Even the prophet Nathan encouraged him to keep this promise despite the fact that his son Adonijah wanted to be the next King. Solomon indeed becomes king and orders his brother’s execution (so much for relationships here!). David’s life is said to have been 70 years following the Psalmist: “The span of our life is 70 years.” (Ps. 90:10 – 3 score and 10). Whatever the actual length of days of these early ancestors, they pave the way for recognizing that the Covenant made to Abraham and Sarah continues on despite the struggles, pains, sorrows and joys of learning to live together as G-d’s imperfect and yet loved people. That promise lives on to the present day.

 

For Reflection and Discussion: 1. When you look closely at the ancestors and their stories, do you find connections with the realities we face today? In what ways are we “the same”? Or “different”? 2. With the newly canonized saints of the Church, we are called to see that throughout history in every generation, G-d summons followers to hear the Word and keep it. No matter the length of our days, we are each called to live our truth in faith as we understand it. How does the life of Sarah and those who follow, inspire us or give us insights into our present relationships and connections to our sisters and brothers around the world?

 

Bibliography: Shapiro The Women’s Torah Commentary – Vermont, 2000; Leibowitz New Studies in Bereshit (Genesis) – Israel; Fox The Five Books of Moses – New York, 1995; Plaut The Haftarah Commentary, New York, 1996

This week’s teaching commentary was prepared by

Mary Louise Chesley-Cora, M.A.T. Religious Studies, Hockessin DE USA, BK alum 2001

Email:  chezcor@msn.com

[Copyright © 2018]

 

…………………………………………………………

PLEASE NOTE: The weekly Parashah commentaries represent the research and creative thought of their authors, and are meant to stimulate deeper thinking about the meaning of the Scriptures. While they draw upon the study methods and sources employed by the Bat Kol Institute, the views and conclusions expressed in these commentaries are solely those of their authors, and do not necessarily represent the views of Bat Kol.   The commentaries, along with all materials published on the Bat Kol website, are copyrighted by the writers, and are made available for personal and group study, and local church purposes. Permission needed for other purposes.  Questions, comments and feedback are always welcome.

………………………………………………….

 

           ~~1983-2018~~

Bat Kol Institute, Jerusalem

“Christians Studying the Bible within its Jewish milieu, using Jewish Sources.”

Website: www.batkol.info; Parashah Admin: gill@batkol.info

@import url(https://www.ratisbonne.org.il/bk/wp-content/plugins/siteorigin-panels/css/front-flex.min.css); #pgc-4370-0-0 , #pgc-4370-0-2 { width:10%;width:calc(10% – ( 0.9 * 30px ) ) } #pgc-4370-0-1 { width:80%;width:calc(80% – ( 0.2 * 30px ) ) } #pl-4370 #panel-4370-0-1-0 { } #pl-4370 .so-panel { margin-bottom:30px } #pl-4370 .so-panel:last-child { margin-bottom:0px } #pg-4370-0.panel-no-style, #pg-4370-0.panel-has-style > .panel-row-style { -webkit-align-items:flex-start;align-items:flex-start } @media (max-width:780px){ #pg-4370-0.panel-no-style, #pg-4370-0.panel-has-style > .panel-row-style { -webkit-flex-direction:column;-ms-flex-direction:column;flex-direction:column } #pg-4370-0 .panel-grid-cell { margin-right:0 } #pg-4370-0 .panel-grid-cell { width:100% } #pgc-4370-0-0 , #pgc-4370-0-1 { margin-bottom:30px } #pl-4370 .panel-grid-cell { padding:0 } #pl-4370 .panel-grid .panel-grid-cell-empty { display:none } #pl-4370 .panel-grid .panel-grid-cell-mobile-last { margin-bottom:0px } }

Parashat Vayeira

Shabbat Table Talk

Parashat Vayeira – Erev Shabbat 26 October 2018

Week of 21-27 October 2018

Torah portion: Genesis 18:1-22:24   Haftarah: 2 Kgs. 4:1-37

Theme: The Power of Ten…or One


 

Download

 

The outcry was great and the sin grievous – and Vayeira – he appeared. When the Creator appears, life happens and his visits are never uneventful. Babies are foretold, hospitality is shared, sin is destroyed, faith is enhanced, families are established, and covenants are created and renewed. This week’s Torah portion is no different.

 

After the Lord visited Abraham and Sarah, making a laugh-inducing announcement about a forthcoming baby, an interesting interaction unfolds about his plans for the sinful city of Sodom. The Lord’s plans are not declared without a response from Abraham. Knowing the Lord to be just and always do what’s right, Abraham pleaded with the Lord for Sodom. He pleaded for the righteous, and the unrighteous. For the faithful and the sinful. Abraham is neither exclusivist, nor legalistic; after all Rashi explains, “God has appointed Abraham as the ‘father of a multitude of nations’ (Gen 17:5), and hence the people of Sodom are his children, too.” By his pleading, Abraham affirmatively answers his ancestors’ indignant question, “Am I my brother’s keeper?” (Gen 4:9). As Abraham’s seed, we too are our brothers’ keepers. Even those stuck in Sodom are our brothers.

 

Herein we face a challenge. Have you ever wondered if your life and your decisions really make a difference? With overwhelming challenges, pain and sin in our world, can a single lone voice do anything significant? Indeed it can. You can be like Abraham who pleads for a lost city. You can be like those ten righteous ones in Sodom whom God sought, but could not find (Gen 18:32-33). You can be the one for whom God directed Jeremiah to hunt: Go up and down the streets of Jerusalem, look around and consider, search through her squares. If you can find but one person who deals honestly and seeks the truth, I will forgive this city (Jer 5:1). You can be like the poor widow (2 Kings 4:1-7) or the wealthy Shunammite (2 Kings 4:8-14).

 

When facing despair and waywardness, God seeks out the righteous and those with open-handed willingness. No other qualifications matter. The women in the Haftarah demonstrate it matters not what we have or what we bring. The poor widow whose sons were destined for slavery, trusted the Lord with her small portion of oil. The wealthy Shunammite who had no son, created space for the Lord in her home. In response, God provided in tangible ways – with an abundance of oil to sell, and a son to look after her. And the power of one becomes apparent again as sons are spared from slavery, provisions are given, the Lord’s servant is housed, families are expanded, and life is restored. Let us not lose heart if we have little to offer, feel very alone, or see no good of our efforts. “For the eyes of the LORD range throughout the earth to strengthen those whose hearts are fully committed to him” (2 Chron 16:9).

 

For Reflection and Discussion:  [1] How can you practically be your brother’s keeper today, particularly in the midst of “Sodom”?  [2] Share a story from your experience that demonstrates the “power of one”. How do the Scriptures from Genesis 18, Jeremiah 5 and 2 Kings 4 encourage and challenge you about the “power of one”?

 

Bibliography:  Plaut, The Torah: A Modern Commentary (Union for Reform Judaism, 2005)

 

This week’s teaching commentary is by

Rev. Dr. Kristen Bennett Marble, West Morris Church Senior Pastor, Indianapolis IN
Bat Kol Alum 2013
kristen@kristenmarble.com

[Copyright © 2018]

 

………………………………………………

PLEASE NOTE: The weekly Parashah commentaries represent the research and creative thought of their authors, and are meant to stimulate deeper thinking about the meaning of the Scriptures. While they draw upon the study methods and sources employed by the Bat Kol Institute, the views and conclusions expressed in these commentaries are solely those of their authors, and do not necessarily represent the views of Bat Kol.   The commentaries, along with all materials published on the Bat Kol website, are copyrighted by the writers, and are made available for personal and group study, and local church purposes. Permission needed for other purposes.  Questions, comments and feedback are always welcome.

………………………………………………………

 

Bat Kol Institute for Jewish Studies, Jerusalem

~~1983-2018~~

“Christians Studying the Bible within its Jewish milieu, using Jewish Sources.”

Website: www.batkol.info;   Parashah Admin: gill@batkol.info

@import url(https://www.ratisbonne.org.il/bk/wp-content/plugins/siteorigin-panels/css/front-flex.min.css); #pgc-4347-0-0 , #pgc-4347-0-2 { width:10%;width:calc(10% – ( 0.9 * 30px ) ) } #pgc-4347-0-1 { width:80%;width:calc(80% – ( 0.2 * 30px ) ) } #pl-4347 #panel-4347-0-1-0 { } #pl-4347 .so-panel { margin-bottom:30px } #pl-4347 .so-panel:last-child { margin-bottom:0px } #pg-4347-0.panel-no-style, #pg-4347-0.panel-has-style > .panel-row-style { -webkit-align-items:flex-start;align-items:flex-start } @media (max-width:780px){ #pg-4347-0.panel-no-style, #pg-4347-0.panel-has-style > .panel-row-style { -webkit-flex-direction:column;-ms-flex-direction:column;flex-direction:column } #pg-4347-0 .panel-grid-cell { margin-right:0 } #pg-4347-0 .panel-grid-cell { width:100% } #pgc-4347-0-0 , #pgc-4347-0-1 { margin-bottom:30px } #pl-4347 .panel-grid-cell { padding:0 } #pl-4347 .panel-grid .panel-grid-cell-empty { display:none } #pl-4347 .panel-grid .panel-grid-cell-mobile-last { margin-bottom:0px } }

Parashat Lech Lecha

Shabbat Table Talk

Parashah Lech Lecha – Erev Shabbat 19th October, 2018

Week of 14th-20th October 14, 2018

Torah portion: Gen 12:1 – 17:27 Haftarah : Isa 40:27 – 41:16


 

Download

 

This week’s Torah portion, Lech Lecha (literally, betake yourself; go to you), begins with the story of God’s call to Abraham, the promise of blessings and Abraham’s response (Gen 12: 1-3). Towards the end it tells us that God describes his covenant with Abraham and his descendants “as an everlasting covenant throughout the ages” (Gen17:7).

 

Conroy says that Abraham’s call has two components: The “go from” and the “go to.” The “go from” command has these details – “Go from your country, your kindred and your father’s house.” Like a migrant today, Abraham is asked to leave his country and his family. He is asked to leave everything behind.

 

The “go to” command, however, says only vaguely, “Go to the land that I will show you.” But where? How far? No details are given, making the command difficult as Abraham is not given the security of knowing his destination.

 

The promise though after the command is quite clear: “I will make you a great nation, and I will bless you, and make your name great, so that you will be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you, and the one who curses you I will curse; and in you all families of the earth shall be blessed.” It is a promise full of blessings (It repeats the word bless/blessing many times).

 

Rashi says that the promise “And I will make you into a great nation” addresses the concerns when one is traveling (there’s diminished procreation, money and fame) and is about the three blessings concerning children, money and fame.

 

Abraham’s response is also quite clear. The narrative, in fact, is brief: “So Abram went, as the Lord had told him.” There is nothing said about the doubts of Abraham, if any. There was nothing said on how he arrived at the decision , on how he told those he would leave behind, etc.

 

What the text tells us is the perfect obedience of Abraham, telling us that he is a man of faith. Despite the unclear destination, Abraham trusted the Lord and left everything familiar. This makes Abraham a model of faith for all of us.

 

But Abraham’s journey of faith was not smooth. In Gen 12:7, we learned that the Lord makes another promise to Abraham: “To your offspring, I will give this land.” Despite the Lord’s explicit promise of offspring to Abraham, who at 75 then was childless, Abraham, on the face of famine, decided to leave the land being promised to him and went down to Egypt and resided there as an alien. Before entering Egypt, Abraham told his wife Sarah to pretend he was her brother, so that “my life may be spared on your account.” Because of this, Sarah was taken to Pharaoh’s house, endangering the promise of offspring to Abraham.

 

But despite his selfish act, the Lord does not abandon Abraham. In a later vision, he tells Abraham not to be afraid: “I am your shield; your reward shall be great.” (Gen. 15).

 

In Gen 17, God commands Abraham to “walk before me and be blameless” and changes his birth name Abram to Abraham (father of multitudes in Aramaic and Hebrew) as he makes another covenant with Abraham to “make you exceedingly numerous.”

 

There is a Jewish term, Avraham Avinu (Abraham, our Father).” But today, not only Jews consider themselves children of Abraham. Muslims as well as Christians also consider Abraham as their ancestor (Matthew 1:1).

 

Like Abraham, we may have our moments of perfect immediate response to a call to serve God and express our faith. But though we try to be committed Christians, there may be times when, like Abraham, we get sidetracked and may not be as faithful as we hope to be. Abraham’s journey of faith tells us that the Lord will not abandon us even in our moments of weakness. God will always be with us.

 

Reflection and Discussion: 1) Recall and share a moment when like Abraham you immediately answered or acted on a call to serve God. 2). Do you have an Abraham-like model of faith? Please share why he/she is your model. 3) In your journey of faith, also recall a moment of when you were weak and felt like losing faith. What did you do to walk with faith once again? 4) How can we help in the journeys of faith of members of our family and community?

 

Bibliography: Conroy, Journeys and Servants, CBAP Lectures 2003 (Quezon City, 2006); ETZ Hayim: Torah and Commentary (New York, 2001); NRSV and http;//www.chabad.org

 

This week’s Sunday Gospel Commentary was prepared by

Miner Generalao, Philippines, Bat Kol July 2014 Alumni

Email address: mayneer@gmail.com

[Copyright © 2018]

 

………………………………………………………….

PLEASE NOTE: The weekly Parashah commentaries represent the research and creative thought of their authors, and are meant to stimulate deeper thinking about the meaning of the Scriptures. While they draw upon the study methods and sources employed by the Bat Kol Institute, the views and conclusions expressed in these commentaries are solely those of their authors, and do not necessarily represent the views of Bat Kol. The commentaries, along with all materials published on the Bat Kol website, are copyrighted by the writers, and are made available for personal and group study, and local church purposes. Permission needed for other purposes. Questions, comments and feedback are always welcome.

…………………………………………………………

 

Bat Kol Institute for Jewish Studies, Jerusalem

~~1983-2017~~

“Christians Studying the Bible within its Jewish milieu, using Jewish Sources.”

Website: www.batkol.info; Parashat Admin: gill@batkol.info

@import url(https://www.ratisbonne.org.il/bk/wp-content/plugins/siteorigin-panels/css/front-flex.min.css); #pgc-4306-0-0 , #pgc-4306-0-2 { width:10%;width:calc(10% – ( 0.9 * 30px ) ) } #pgc-4306-0-1 { width:80%;width:calc(80% – ( 0.2 * 30px ) ) } #pl-4306 #panel-4306-0-1-0 { } #pl-4306 .so-panel { margin-bottom:30px } #pl-4306 .so-panel:last-child { margin-bottom:0px } #pg-4306-0.panel-no-style, #pg-4306-0.panel-has-style > .panel-row-style { -webkit-align-items:flex-start;align-items:flex-start } @media (max-width:780px){ #pg-4306-0.panel-no-style, #pg-4306-0.panel-has-style > .panel-row-style { -webkit-flex-direction:column;-ms-flex-direction:column;flex-direction:column } #pg-4306-0 .panel-grid-cell { margin-right:0 } #pg-4306-0 .panel-grid-cell { width:100% } #pgc-4306-0-0 , #pgc-4306-0-1 { margin-bottom:30px } #pl-4306 .panel-grid-cell { padding:0 } #pl-4306 .panel-grid .panel-grid-cell-empty { display:none } #pl-4306 .panel-grid .panel-grid-cell-mobile-last { margin-bottom:0px } }

Parashat Noach

Shabbat Table Talk

Parashat Noach– Erev Shabbat 12th October 2018

Week of 7th- 13th October 2018

Torah portion: Genesis 6:9-11:32 Haftarah: Isaiah 54:1-55:5


 

Download

 

Noah is described as righteous [tzaddik] and blameless (tamim) amongst his generation (6:9), but this does not necessarily indicate that he is one whose example should be followed (not unlike a number of the characters we meet in Genesis). Hassidic commentator Levi Yitshak (Green, p. 90) describes Noah as a “failed tsaddik”, who “misjudged his own abilities [to overturn, or at least question the decree of the divine to destroy humanity] and therefore did not act to save his generation from the flood.” Further, Morris Adler (in Plaut, 80) notes that Noah “lacked compassion” and thus failed to show “solicitude”, “tenderness”, or “regret” in regard to the lives that would be lost in the deluge that God was to send upon the world.

 

Others (Sacks, Kindle 826-832) compare Noah to Abraham, with the former failing to reach the heights of the later in terms of character, action and capacity to challenge the divine decree that all should be punished, save for Noah and his family. Sacks notes: “Abraham who challenged heaven itself in words unrivalled in the history of the human encounter with God: ‘Shall the Judge of all the earth not do justice?’ (18:25).” Would Abraham have saved the world? One will never know the answer to this, but it is not out of the question that Abraham would have at least raised his voice in defence of those facing the wrath of God.

 

Editor of the Earth Bible, Norman Habel takes all of this one step further in seeking to extend the range of Abraham’s culpability to his incapacity to recognise the place of the earth and all of its creatures in this drama. Habel (Kindle 560) notes: “the forces of divine destruction reach beyond the culprits and include the innocent: God explicitly plans to destroy all these corrupted creatures ‘along with Earth’ [cf. 6:13].” Here, Habel is not reserving his criticism for the mortal Noah, but also for the Divine, though this is not without precedent (see Abraham above).

 

One might doubt the capacity of the biblical author to approach the story of the flood through a worldview cognisant with that of integral ecology, but Habel’s point is a valid one and impels one to explore the relevance of this tale for our world today. Plaut (p. 73) also notes that contemporary readers are not likely to read this narrative literally, but rather to see it as an exploration of God’s “moral judgement” on the actions of humanity. Plaut writes:

 

In considering the story as a homily on the consequences of human corruption, lawlessness, and violence, we can affirm that they do bring on the judgment of God. We may experience it in social and moral conditions, or in nature’s physical realm (as in our pollution of the atmosphere and water, or our disturbance of the ecological balance). An offense against this balance is an offense against God (who guarantees life and its laws), which may occasion dire and unforeseen consequences.

 

Questions for Reflection: In the light of the crises facing Earth, our common home, and all its creatures will we be judged as Noah or Abraham by future generations?

 

Bibliography: Green, Arthur. Speaking Torah, Vol. 1: Spiritual Teachings from around the Maggid’s Table (Woodstock, VT: Jewish Lights, 2013); Habel, Norman. An Inconvenient Text: Is a Green Reading of the Bible Possible? (Adelaide: AFT Press, 2009); W. Gunther Plaut and David E. Stein, eds., The Torah: A Modern Commentary, Revised; (New York: Union for Reform Judaism, 2006); Sacks, Jonathan. Genesis: The Book of Beginnings (London, Maggid Books & The Orthodox Union, 2009).

 

This week’s teaching commentary is by

Mark David Walsh, B.A. (Ed.), B. Th., Grad. Dip. R.E., M.R.E., Melbourne, Australia,

BK Alumnus, 2001, ‘02, ’04, ‘13.

markdavidwalsh@gmail.com

[Copyright © 2018]

 

.………………………………………………

PLEASE NOTE: The weekly Parashah commentaries represent the research and creative thought of their authors, and are meant to stimulate deeper thinking about the meaning of the Scriptures. While they draw upon the study methods and sources employed by the Bat Kol Institute, the views and conclusions expressed in these commentaries are solely those of their authors, and do not necessarily represent the views of Bat Kol. The commentaries, along with all materials published on the Bat Kol website, are copyrighted by the writers, and are made available for personal and group study, and local church purposes. Permission needed for other purposes. Questions, comments and feedback are always welcome.

…………………………………………………

 

Bat Kol Institute for Jewish Studies, Jerusalem

~~1983-2018~~

“Christians Studying the Bible within its Jewish milieu, using Jewish Sources.”

Website: www.batkol.info; Parashah Admin: gill@batkol.info

@import url(https://www.ratisbonne.org.il/bk/wp-content/plugins/siteorigin-panels/css/front-flex.min.css); #pgc-4280-0-0 , #pgc-4280-0-2 { width:10%;width:calc(10% – ( 0.9 * 30px ) ) } #pgc-4280-0-1 { width:80%;width:calc(80% – ( 0.2 * 30px ) ) } #pl-4280 #panel-4280-0-1-0 { } #pl-4280 .so-panel { margin-bottom:30px } #pl-4280 .so-panel:last-child { margin-bottom:0px } #pg-4280-0.panel-no-style, #pg-4280-0.panel-has-style > .panel-row-style { -webkit-align-items:flex-start;align-items:flex-start } @media (max-width:780px){ #pg-4280-0.panel-no-style, #pg-4280-0.panel-has-style > .panel-row-style { -webkit-flex-direction:column;-ms-flex-direction:column;flex-direction:column } #pg-4280-0 .panel-grid-cell { margin-right:0 } #pg-4280-0 .panel-grid-cell { width:100% } #pgc-4280-0-0 , #pgc-4280-0-1 { margin-bottom:30px } #pl-4280 .panel-grid-cell { padding:0 } #pl-4280 .panel-grid .panel-grid-cell-empty { display:none } #pl-4280 .panel-grid .panel-grid-cell-mobile-last { margin-bottom:0px } }

Parashat Bereishit

Shabbat Table Talk

Parashat Bereishit – Erev Shabbat 5th October 2018

Week of 30th September – 6th October 2018

Torah portion: Genesis 1:1-6:8 Haftarah: Isaiah 42:5-43:10


 

Download

 

Was adam more than just the first man? In Genesis 1:26, we read: “God said: Let us make humankind, in our image, according to our likeness!” The Hebrew word translated as humankind in this verse is adam. Fox (p.15) notes that the term does not specify sex, for God creates adam male and female (1:27). The creation of adam comes as the culmination of creation and is “exceedingly good (1:31)!” Coupled with the double command to have “dominion” (1:26, 28) over the rest of creation and to “fill the earth and subdue it” (1:28), is it any wonder that adam has brought Earth to the point of ecological crisis?

 

Have adam and Earth always been in a state of estrangement? One only has to look to the text to find the answer: “there was no human/adam to till the soil/adamah – but a surge would well up from the ground [adamah] and water all the face of the soil [adamah]; and YHWH, God, formed the human [adam], of the dust from the soil [adamah]” (Gen 2:5-7). Arthur Waskow (pp. vii-viii), notes that adam and adamah [earth] are in fact intertwined, with the Hebrew word for each bearing the echo of the other. He notes further that the absence of the breath-like “ah” sound at the end of adamah from adam represents the loss of the “unconscious breathing that connected the earliest human beings with the earth from which they had just emerged.” (p. viii) The wanton exploitation of Earth’s resources by adam – particularly in the last centuries – only serves to highlight this estrangement. (N.B. The word adamah can also be translated as ‘ground’ or ‘soil’, but is translated as ‘earth’ in many Jewish texts dealing with ecology, eco-spirituality and eco-justice.)

 

What chance does adam have of rehabilitation and reconnection with Earth? The answer lies once more in a careful and creative reading of the Hebrew text. Shai Cherry, (p. 47) notes, “the Hebrew for imagination is dimyon, which echoes both the name adam (human) and our likeness (d’mut) to the Divine.” What then does it mean to be created in the Divine image? Joseph Soloveitchik remarks that “[adam’s] likeness to God expresses itself in [adam’s] striving and ability to become a creator” (in Cherry p. 48). It is in our ability to imagine a solution that our salvation might be found and that salvation must recognise adam’s interconnectedness with adamah.

 

What part does Sabbath play in the solution? Franz Rosenzweig describes the Sabbath as the dream of perfection that becomes the constant renewal of creation. This thought is echoed by Simchah Bunam who speaks of creation as being in an “uncompleted state.” His argument is that since God created the world in a state of beginning “it requires continuous labour and renewal by creative [imaginative] forces” so that it does not return to the “primeval chaos” from which it was created (Plaut p. 25). Shai Cherry (p. 48) reminds us: “Our imaginative faculty brings out what is distinctive about us humans. We can imagine a different world.” A possibility that places adam in a unique place within creation.

 

For Reflection and Discussion: (1) How might I describe my relationship with adamah? (2) What future do I imagine for those yet to be born? How might I creatively make that dream a reality? What part does Sabbath play in adam’s reconnection with adamah?

 

Bibliography: Bernstein (Ed.) Ecology & the Jewish Spirit (Woodstock, 1998); Cherry, Torah Through Time (2007, Philadelphia); Fox, The Five Books of Moses (New York, 1997); Plaut, The Torah: A Modern Commentary (New York, 1981); Waskow ed. Torah of the Earth (Woodstock)

 

This week’s teaching commentary is by

Mark David Walsh, B.A. (Ed.), B. Th., Grad. Dip. R.E., M.R.E., Melbourne, Australia,

BK Alumnus, 2001, ‘02, ’04, ‘13.

markdavidwalsh@gmail.com

[Copyright © 2018]

 

…………………………………………………………

PLEASE NOTE: The weekly Parashah commentaries represent the research and creative thought of their authors, and are meant to stimulate deeper thinking about the meaning of the Scriptures. While they draw upon the study methods and sources employed by the Bat Kol Institute, the views and conclusions expressed in these commentaries are solely those of their authors, and do not necessarily represent the views of Bat Kol. The commentaries, along with all materials published on the Bat Kol website, are copyrighted by the writers, and are made available for personal and group study, and local church purposes. Permission needed for other purposes. Questions, comments and feedback are always welcome.

…………………………………………………………

 

Bat Kol Institute for Jewish Studies, Jerusalem

~~1983-2018~~

“Christians Studying the Bible within its Jewish milieu, using Jewish Sources.”

Website: www.batkol.info; Parashah Admin: gill@batkol.info

@import url(https://www.ratisbonne.org.il/bk/wp-content/plugins/siteorigin-panels/css/front-flex.min.css); #pgc-4254-0-0 , #pgc-4254-0-2 { width:10%;width:calc(10% – ( 0.9 * 30px ) ) } #pgc-4254-0-1 { width:80%;width:calc(80% – ( 0.2 * 30px ) ) } #pl-4254 #panel-4254-0-1-0 { } #pl-4254 .so-panel { margin-bottom:30px } #pl-4254 .so-panel:last-child { margin-bottom:0px } #pg-4254-0.panel-no-style, #pg-4254-0.panel-has-style > .panel-row-style { -webkit-align-items:flex-start;align-items:flex-start } @media (max-width:780px){ #pg-4254-0.panel-no-style, #pg-4254-0.panel-has-style > .panel-row-style { -webkit-flex-direction:column;-ms-flex-direction:column;flex-direction:column } #pg-4254-0 .panel-grid-cell { margin-right:0 } #pg-4254-0 .panel-grid-cell { width:100% } #pgc-4254-0-0 , #pgc-4254-0-1 { margin-bottom:30px } #pl-4254 .panel-grid-cell { padding:0 } #pl-4254 .panel-grid .panel-grid-cell-empty { display:none } #pl-4254 .panel-grid .panel-grid-cell-mobile-last { margin-bottom:0px } }

Parashat Chol HaMo’ed Sukkot

Shabbat Table Talk

Parashat Chol HaMo’ed Sukkot – Erev Shabbat 28th September 2018

Week of 23rd – 29th September, 2018

Torah Portion: Exodus 33:12-34:26 Haftarah: Ezekiel 38.18-39.16

Theme: In Crisis, Creation Takes Place


 

Download

 

Today’s readings fall on the 20th of Tishrei of Sukkot VI. At first glance, we might not see the connection of the Torah portion with today’s Haftarah, and it is worthwhile to see these readings’ close connection. The Israelites in both accounts of the book can be said were in their troubled times, that is in exile: in the wilderness in Exodus, and a seemingly “wilderness” in Babylon at the time of Ezekiel. Nonetheless, there is a promise of an exodus, a “drawing out” and this settles them to their “home”, to the Promised Land and a return to Israel. In this case, both readings depict, exile and exodus, of a promise, of G-d’s presence, and of hope. Let us appreciate the readings’ parallelism.

 

It was on the mountain that G-d manifested the Divine presence to Moses, when the latter requested G-d to include in the Divine favor the entire people of Israel. Surely, G-d promises to bestow favor on the people and this is sealed with a covenant. Moses, I suppose made the plea in solidarity with his people who seem to experience a sense of loss and are on the edge of hopelessness. G-d’s assurance of the Divine presence in the midst of crisis through the covenant is enough for them to move forward and hope for the moment. The people must remember the covenant with G-d to sustain them through their sojourn in the “wild”. The Israelites who are in “exile” will soon experience “exodus” from the unsafe territory to a land flowing with milk and honey. On the one hand, Ezekiel assures the people of a return to Jerusalem, for they who are in exile will soon find themselves in “exodus”. Ezekiel’s prophecy is to bring hope to the people and portrays a dramatic and graphic pictorial of G-d’s redemptive action, which is fiery and furious towards Gog (which in Hebrew means, “mountain”). Gog’s downfall and destruction will manifest Israel’s G-d, but more that this is a revelation of the Divine presence, not on a mountain but against Gog (mountain). Ezekiel describes the destruction that is apocalyptic beginning with a terrible earthquake, mountains overthrown, cliffs topple and walls crumble, there will be pestilence and bloodshed, torrential rains, hailstones and sulfurous fire. It seems that they who are in exile are being prepared for their future exodus from crisis, and it matters that the land be cleansed, for them to start anew.

 

How can we make sense of this in our lives today? There are varied ways to seeing all these, yet I would like to focus on Gog, which as mentioned above also means “mountain”. A mountain can represent either our inflated ego or humongous crises in life; and in both cases, we can fail to sense G-d’s reality in our midst, because the mountain has blocked our sight of the Divine presence. We could forget that G-d is on “top” of everything, thus we at times will be tempted to lose hope and even doubt G-d’s presence. Yet G-d’s way for us to see the Divine presence is to allow a quake that will crumble, swipe and consume to ashes our worries, crises, or inflated ego. It is only when we crash that we see and know where we stand, and who stand beside us, who never fail to lift us up, gives us a chance to begin anew.

 

Remember: God’s presence to Israel is not a promise, but a reality, which forever will be a guarantee. In crises, or troubled times, hope sustains, because G-d remains.

 

Reflection and Discussion: 1. What is the “Gog” in my life? 2. Are you experiencing as sort of “exile” today? Is this about your relationship with others, self-struggle, a decision to make, emotional turmoil, or something else (identify it)? 3. How do you want G-d to intervene in this poignant point in your life? (Suggestion: express all to G-d, who will sustain, and who surely remains)

 

This week’s Chol HaMo’ed Sukkot Commentary was prepared by

Kristine Meneses, Ph.D., Philippines; Bat Kol Alumna 2016

Email address: krstn.rw@gmail.com

[Copyright © 2018]

 

………………………………………….…………..……

PLEASE NOTE: The weekly Parashah commentaries represent the research and creative thought of their authors, and are meant to stimulate deeper thinking about the meaning of the Scriptures. While they draw upon the study methods and sources employed by the Bat Kol Institute, the views and conclusions expressed in these commentaries are solely those of their authors, and do not necessarily represent the views of Bat Kol. The commentaries, along with all materials published on the Bat Kol website, are copyrighted by the writers, and are made available for personal and group study, and local church purposes. Permission needed for other purposes. Questions, comments and feedback are always welcome.

…………………………………………….………………

 

Bat Kol Institute for Jewish Studies, Jerusalem

1983-2018

“Christians Studying the Bible within its Jewish milieu, using Jewish Sources.”

Website: www.batkol.info Parashat Admin: gill@batkol.info

@import url(https://www.ratisbonne.org.il/bk/wp-content/plugins/siteorigin-panels/css/front-flex.min.css); #pgc-4207-0-0 , #pgc-4207-0-2 { width:10%;width:calc(10% – ( 0.9 * 30px ) ) } #pgc-4207-0-1 { width:80%;width:calc(80% – ( 0.2 * 30px ) ) } #pl-4207 #panel-4207-0-1-0 { } #pl-4207 .so-panel { margin-bottom:30px } #pl-4207 .so-panel:last-child { margin-bottom:0px } #pg-4207-0.panel-no-style, #pg-4207-0.panel-has-style > .panel-row-style { -webkit-align-items:flex-start;align-items:flex-start } @media (max-width:780px){ #pg-4207-0.panel-no-style, #pg-4207-0.panel-has-style > .panel-row-style { -webkit-flex-direction:column;-ms-flex-direction:column;flex-direction:column } #pg-4207-0 .panel-grid-cell { margin-right:0 } #pg-4207-0 .panel-grid-cell { width:100% } #pgc-4207-0-0 , #pgc-4207-0-1 { margin-bottom:30px } #pl-4207 .panel-grid-cell { padding:0 } #pl-4207 .panel-grid .panel-grid-cell-empty { display:none } #pl-4207 .panel-grid .panel-grid-cell-mobile-last { margin-bottom:0px } }

Parashat Ha’azinu

Shabbat Table Talk

Parashat Ha’azinu – Erev Shabbat 21st September 2018

Week of 17 – 22 September

Torah portion: Deut. 32: 1 – 52 Haftarah: Hosea 14:2 – 10


 

Download

 

In my latest commentary on Parashat Balak, I mentioned there how Bro. Jack Driscol encouraged us to try and read the whole Torah Portion for the week. Now to write a commentary on a Parashat, one is asked to read at least five different versions or editions of the Parashat. If one can find the time, it is very interesting and an eye opening in the excavation of words and the text. I find it very interesting, in my level of learning as each edition is different and unique in its form and style. Parashat Ha’azinu has 52 verses. In the Jerusalem Bible, the heading is, “The Song of Moses” (verses 1-44), “The Law, the source of Life” (verse 45-47) and “Moses’ death foretold” (verse 48-52).(JB. Popular Edition pg. 225).

 

There are two songs ascribed to Moses in the Hebrew Bible. The Song of the Sea, “Hebrew: Shirat HaYam, also known as Az Yashir Moshe” (Exodus15:1-18). The Song of the Sea, commencing with the Latin incipit Cantemus Domino:(Wikipedia) “I will sing to the Lord, for he has triumphed gloriously; the horse and his rider he has thrown into the sea”(Exodus 15:1). The second song, is our Torah Portion for this week, Parashat Ha’azinu.

 

The very first line to this song, Ha’azinu “Give ear O heavens,… Let the earth hear…”, echoes two realities frequently mentioned in the Bible. Heaven and earth are full of your glory, hosanna in the highest. Heaven and earth are both fitting audiences and witnesses of the Ha’azinu. Heaven and earth is mentioned in Psalm 85:11 “faithfulness spring from the earth and justice look down from heaven”. The forecast of the song is so colorful. In verse 2, “May my teaching be drenching as the rain, …permeate gently as the dew”. Torah is compared to the rain, water is the source of life, and nothing can grow without rain.

 

What could be the centrality of this song. Everett Fox has this to say: The “song” emphasis the power and caring nature of God, which is contrasted with Israel’s pathetic response of unfaithfulness. God is likened to a nurturing parent and a protecting eagle. God hovers over the Jewish people like an eagle. First she awakens her chicks gently. Then the eagle carries its young on its wings to protect them from predators. On Dt 32:4, “The Rock! – His deeds are perfect, Yes all his ways are just”. W.G Plaut commented “The Rock (Ha Tzur), the term denoting rugged steadfastness. Jewish and Christian liturgies frequently use this inscription, Rock of Israel, Rock of Ages, my Rock and my Redeemer” (Plaut pg 1556).

 

We still have the final Parashat, V’Zot HaBerachah (Dt 33:1-34:12), but in Parashat Ha’azinu, we come to witness the end of this great man of God, Moses. In Dt 32:50-52, “You shall die on this mountain that you are about to ascend, ….for you both broke faith with Me among the Israelites people … you shall view the land from a distance, but you shall not enter it – that land that I am giving to the Israelite people”. How humble can you get. In verse 51, it refers to the story told in Num. 20 where the failure of Moses and Aaron, during a rebellion, led God to pronounce the judgment of death on the two leaders. I would like to end the portion of Ha’azinu in the book of Davarim (Words)with the memory of the joint mission of Moses and Aaron to Pharaoh in Egypt, in Exodus 4. God asked Moses to go and speak to Pharaoh in Egypt, and Moses replied “never have I been a fluent speaker … I cannot find words to express what I want to say” (Ex 4:10). Moses, a man with few words in Exodus, to a comprehensive knowledgeable Moses composing the Ha’azinu, in Devarim (Words).

 

Bibliography: The Jerusalem Bible-Popular Edition. Plaut, The Torah, A Modern Commentary (UAHC New York 1981). Fox, The Five Books of Moses (Shocken, Random House New York, 1997).

 

For Reflection and Discussion: 1. The first song of Moses “Song of the Sea”, what can you say? 2. The second song, the Ha’azinu, how does it speak to you? 3. “Moses, you shall not enter the Land, but shall only see it from afar”, what is your thinking?

 

This week’s teaching commentary was prepared by

Aliki A Langi. Bat Kol alumni 2005 and 2018

Email: 1alikilangi@tpg.com.au

[Copyright © 2018]

 

……………………………………………………

PLEASE NOTE: The weekly Parashah commentaries represent the research and creative thought of their authors, and are meant to stimulate deeper thinking about the meaning of the Scriptures. While they draw upon the study methods and sources employed by the Bat Kol Institute, the views and conclusions expressed in these commentaries are solely those of their authors, and do not necessarily represent the views of Bat Kol. The commentaries, along with all materials published on the Bat Kol website, are copyrighted by the writers, and are made available for personal and group study, and local church purposes. Permission needed for other purposes. Questions, comments and feedback are always welcome.

….………………………………………………

 

Bat Kol Institute for Jewish Studies, Jerusalem

~~1983-2018~~

“Christians Studying the Bible within its Jewish milieu, using Jewish Sources.”

Website: www.batkol.info; Parashah Admin: gill@batkol.info

@import url(https://www.ratisbonne.org.il/bk/wp-content/plugins/siteorigin-panels/css/front-flex.min.css); #pgc-4171-0-0 , #pgc-4171-0-2 { width:10%;width:calc(10% – ( 0.9 * 30px ) ) } #pgc-4171-0-1 { width:80%;width:calc(80% – ( 0.2 * 30px ) ) } #pl-4171 #panel-4171-0-1-0 { } #pl-4171 .so-panel { margin-bottom:30px } #pl-4171 .so-panel:last-child { margin-bottom:0px } #pg-4171-0.panel-no-style, #pg-4171-0.panel-has-style > .panel-row-style { -webkit-align-items:flex-start;align-items:flex-start } @media (max-width:780px){ #pg-4171-0.panel-no-style, #pg-4171-0.panel-has-style > .panel-row-style { -webkit-flex-direction:column;-ms-flex-direction:column;flex-direction:column } #pg-4171-0 .panel-grid-cell { margin-right:0 } #pg-4171-0 .panel-grid-cell { width:100% } #pgc-4171-0-0 , #pgc-4171-0-1 { margin-bottom:30px } #pl-4171 .panel-grid-cell { padding:0 } #pl-4171 .panel-grid .panel-grid-cell-empty { display:none } #pl-4171 .panel-grid .panel-grid-cell-mobile-last { margin-bottom:0px } }