Palm Sunday 2018

Palm Sunday 25th March 2018

Readings: Is 50:4-7. Ps 22:8-9, 17-20, 23-24. Phil 2:6-11. Mk 14:1-15:47

Theme: What she has done will be told as well in memory of her. (Mk 14:9)

 

Download

 

Mark begins the first eleven verses of the Passion narrative by using a framing technique. Framed between the plotting of the chief priests and the scribes to arrest Jesus (v1-2) and the betrayal of Judas (v10-11) is the extraordinary story of an unknown woman who anoints Jesus. The framing adds pathos and poignancy, highlighting the abundant generosity of the woman, sand-witched between the trickery of the chief priests and scribes and the betrayal of Judas. In exploring the story of the un-named woman we are in fact entering into the essence of the Passion and for that Jesus wants her remembered.

 

The story is set in Bethany in the dining of the house of Simon, who suffered from leprosy. The entry of a woman carrying an “alabaster jar of ointment, pure nard” (v3), is followed by two dramatic actions on the part on her part. “She broke the jar (an irretrievable act) and poured the ointment on his head”. (v3-4) It is worth noting that the jar is made of alabaster, which is translucent, hinting at the light that is being thrown on the whole Passion narrative through the translucent container and the actions that follow. The woman never utters a word but her actions convey a deep sense of being intuitively in touch with what is about to happen.

 

Her actions bring an indignant response from some of those present. “Why this waste of ointment?” (v4-5) Jesus acknowledges their concern, mindful of Deut. 15:10-11, “Of course, there will never cease to be poor people in the country, and that is why I am giving you this command: Always be open to your brother, and with anyone in your country who is in need.” His audience, apart from the woman, misses the point that the poor brother is there in front of them, since “no one is so poor as the one about to die”. (Flowers in the Desert p151).

 

Jesus defends her actions and acknowledges that what “she has done for me is a good work”. (v6). The New Jerusalem Bible comments on “a good work” by pointing out that it “may possibly be in a Jewish technical sense, the works of compassion being ranked as superior to the duty of almsgiving…”. Michael Crosby in his book Repair my House – becoming a Kindom Catholic states that the woman’s “good deed” can be seen as “a religious activity and linked to the divine action and cosmic action of God’s ‘good deed’ at the beginning of the world…” (p93)

 

Why does Jesus state that this story is an essential part of the gospel? By the woman’s actions of breaking the alabaster jar and the prodigious pouring of the ointment, she has enacted what Jesus is about to do through his passion. His body will be broken and what is most precious, his blood will be poured out in self-giving love, in his role as the Anointed One of God. Her compassionate resourceful presence has prepared him for his burial.

 

Reflection: What if we were more aware of the cosmic significance of our “good deeds”?

 

Bibliography: Crosby, Michael, Repair my House – Becoming a Kindom Catholic (Orbis Books –Box 302, Maryknoll, NY 10545-0302, 2012). Dumm D. Flowers in the Desert (Paulist Press NY/Mahwah 1987. The New Jerusalem Bible (Standard version), (London, Darton, Longman &Todd, 1985)

 

 

This week’s teaching commentary was prepared by

Moya Hegarty os, Sligo, N. Ireland

Bat Kol Alumna, 2007/2015

moyaosu@eircom.net

[Copyright 2018]

 

…………………………………………………………..

PLEASE NOTE: The weekly Gospel commentaries represent the research and creative thought of their authors, and are meant to stimulate deeper thinking about the meaning of the Sunday Scriptures. While they draw upon the study methods and sources employed by the Bat Kol Institute, the views and conclusions expressed in these commentaries are solely those of their authors, and do not necessarily represent the views of Bat Kol. Questions, comments and feedback are always welcome.

…………………………………………………………

 

Bat Kol Institute for Jewish Studies, Jerusalem

1983-2018

“Christians Studying the Bible within its Jewish milieu, using Jewish Sources.”

Website: www.batkol.info gill@batkol.info

 

Parashat Tsav

Shabbat Table Talk

Parashat Tsav, Shabbat HaGadol, Erev Shabbat 23 March, 2018

Week of 18 0 24 March

 

Download

 

Torah Portion: Lev. 6:1-8:36 Haftarah: Mal 3:4-24

 

Theme: Bring Out My Deshen(s)

 

Tzav is a mandatory command of the L-rd to Moshe, that of Shabbat and Pesach. Today is the great Shabbat because a few days from now is the Pesach. Shabbat is rest, while Pesach relives the great freedom. What is the connection of today’s readings that points to different offerings? If we look closely, there is a command of the L-rd that many of us overlooked, – 6:4-6, “He (priest) shall…carry the ashes outside the camp to a clean place. The fire on the altar shall be kept burning, not to go out: every morning the priest shall feed wood to it, lay out the burnt offering on it…A perpetual fire shall be kept burning on the altar, not to go out.” The דשך (deshen: ashes of the fats) are considered a trash that must be יצא (yatza: carry[ied]) outside, or dispose. These fats turned into דשך (deshen: ashes) because of אש(esh: fire). In these three verses, fire and all synonymous to it are redundant, such us: יקד(yaqad: burning) and בער(ba’ar: burn); and the one burned, that is בער(ba’ar) must be disposed.

 

The Hebrew word ba’ar can also mean, “consumed,” “dull-hearted,” “brutish,” “barbarous,” “unreceptive,” or “destroyed;” these can symbolize unpleasant experiences that happened to us, such as: wrong decisions, short-comings, difficulty to forgive (self or others), painful memories, and so on that consumed us. Looking back, these negativities have turned us “brutish”, and therefore destroyed our being, our humanness. Such ashes in our life (deshen) must be להט(lahat: burned) and disposed, because they are אפר(epher: worthless; in Mal. 3.19)

 

It is worthless to dwell on the “dirt” in our life, yet we need to learn from the worthless things, so as to make our life new and worthwhile. Let us not keep residues of these ashes in our life. Do not let the negative past – the ashes, define or configure who you are or who you ought to be. As Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch once said, “in order to fully appreciate something new…it is necessary to ‘bring out the garbage’ and make room for what will be newly created!” Therefore, let us יצא (yatza: clear out) the trashes, release oneself and start anew. The L-rd, through today’s readings is inviting you to a new beginning, that is, a life worthwhile and to its wholeness.

 

Today, a new אש (esh: fire) is being יקד(yaqad: kindled), one that will not be כבה (kabah: extinguished) because the L-rd will keep it in אש (esh: flames). Yet, are you willing to be בער (ba’ar: consumed) by this Divine love that its only desire is to lead you out to authentic freedom?

 

Reflection and Discussion: 1. Is it difficult for me to release the deshen in my life? What prevents me from bringing my deshen out? 2. What has been the effect of the deshen to my relationship to others and to myself? 3. What do I truly desire or what positively consumes me that keeps my life worthwhile?

 

This week’s teaching commentary was prepared by

Kristine Meneses, Ph.D., Philippines; Bat Kol Alumna 2016

Email address: krstn.rw@gmail.com

[Copyright © 2018]

 

……………………………………………….…………..……

PLEASE NOTE: The weekly Parashah commentaries represent the research and creative thought of their authors, and are meant to stimulate deeper thinking about the meaning of the Scriptures. While they draw upon the study methods and sources employed by the Bat Kol Institute, the views and conclusions expressed in these commentaries are solely those of their authors, and do not necessarily represent the views of Bat Kol. The commentaries, along with all materials published on the Bat Kol website, are copyrighted by the writers, and are made available for personal and group study, and local church purposes. Permission needed for other purposes. Questions, comments and feedback are always welcome.

………………………………………………….………………

 

Bat Kol Institute for Jewish Studies, Jerusalem

1983-2018

“Christians Studying the Bible within its Jewish milieu, using Jewish Sources.”

Website: www.batkol.info Parashat Admin: gill@batkol.info

SPECIAL REMINDER FROM BAT KOL INSTITUTE JERUSALEM OFFICE

14 March 2018

Dear Bat Kol Alums and Friends,

 

HOLD THE DATE! 4-25 July 2018

 

This is a reminder that there is still time to apply for a place on the July program. (See attached flyer.)

Please could you extend this reminder to family, colleagues and friends by:

 

  • sharing the flyer;
  • displaying it on noticeboards, in newsletters;
  • posting it on social media.

If you are personally unable to apply, perhaps you could encourage and mentor potential participant(s) and help them with their preparations such as seeking funding for the fee and travel costs? If you would like advice on this, please contact [popup_anything id=”2417″] .

 

Shalom blessings to each of you for your Lenten journey to a joyful Easter, from Bat Kol Institute Jerusalem team.

 

Gill

Revd Gill Putnam

Bat Kol Institute for Jewish Studies,

Jerusalem

 

 

 

The Fifth Sunday of Lent

The Fifth Sunday of Lent (18 March 2018)

Lectionary readings: Jer 31:31-34; Ps 51:3-4. 12-15; Heb 5:7-9; Jn 12:20-33

Theme: Father, glorify your name.

 

Download

 

To what feast is verse 20 referring? John’s public life of Jesus stretches over three years – three Passover Feasts. This is the third and last and Jesus will be the Passover Lamb.

 

The first Passover is at the time of Jesus’ cleansing of the Temple (Jn 2:11-22). This action would have reached many Jews because of the feast. This narrative follows the changing of the water into wine where Jesus tells his mother that his “hour has not yet come” (2:4). We are also told that his disciples began to believe in him.

 

The second Passover takes place when Jesus gives bread to the crowds (‘manna’ – Jn 6:1-15); walks on the water (‘Exodus’ – Jn 6:16-21); and promises his body and blood as food and drink (vv. Jn 6:22-65). Many disciples walked away while the Twelve, through Peter say: “Master, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life.” (v. 68)

 

Back to our reading for today: the Greeks come to Philip and he goes to Andrew with the request to see Jesus (12:21-22). The message of Jesus is extending beyond his disciples and the Jews. Verse 23 speaks about the hour that has now come for “the Son of Man to be glorified”. In case the disciples and we are thinking it is going to be without suffering, Jesus speaks about the importance of the grain of wheat needing to die before it can bring forth fruit (v. 24). If we love and want to protect our own lives we will lose them in “eternal life”. The people who wish to follow Jesus to “eternal life” must be like the grain of wheat (v. 25).

 

‘Service’ is the hallmark of being a follower of Jesus. As the Father honors the Son, so those who follow the Son will also be honored by the Father in “eternal life” (v. 26).

 

Jesus calls on his Father to save him from the hour for which he has come into the world (v. 27). It is the humanity of Jesus that is shrinking from the suffering and abandonment. This echoes what the Synoptics have Jesus cry to his Father in Gethsemane: Matthew 26:39 is an example.

 

Jesus calls on his Father to glorify his name. The Bat Kol is heard answering Jesus. This voice was heard at the Baptism of Jesus and at his Transfiguration. This is God’s assurance of his love for and pleasure in his Son. God answers his Son but it seems that only those who truly listen or whom God has chosen hear the voice (vv. 28-29).

 

Jesus then speaks of the judgment on the world when “the ruler of this world will be driven out” (v. 31). The battle between darkness and light, blindness and true sight is about to take place when Jesus is “lifted up from the earth” on the cross. The seeming disgrace and failure of Jesus hanging on the cross is actually the triumph of the Son of God where he will save all of creation by drawing all to himself in obedience to the Father for the salvation of all (vv. 32-33).

 

For Reflection and Discussion: 1. Be with Jesus in this passage as he looks towards the final Passover. Allow yourself to feel what he is feeling. What is the Bat Kol saying to you?

 

Bibliography: Kee, Young & Froehlich. Understanding the New Testament (New Jersey: 1973); King, N. The New Testament, (Great Britain: 2004); The African Bible, (Nairobi: 1999).

 

This week’s Sunday Gospel Commentary was prepared by

Bernadette Chellew, Durban, South Africa, Bat Kol Alum 2008
Email address: btrnchellew@gmail.com

 

[Copyright © 2018]

 

………………………………………………………………………

PLEASE NOTE: The weekly Gospel commentaries represent the research and creative thought of their authors, and are meant to stimulate deeper thinking about the meaning of the Sunday Scriptures. While they draw upon the study methods and sources employed by the Bat Kol Institute, the views and conclusions expressed in these commentaries are solely those of their authors, and do not necessarily represent the views of Bat Kol. Questions, comments and feedback are always welcome

………………………………………………………………………

 

Bat Kol Institute for Jewish Studies, Jerusalem

1983-2018

“Christians Studying the Bible within its Jewish milieu, using Jewish Sources.”

gill@batkol.info Website: www.batkol.info

Parashat Vayikra

Shabbat Table Talk

Parashat Vayikra, Erev Shabbat 16 March 2018

Week of 11-17 March

Torah portion: Lev.1:1-5:26 Haftarah: Ezek.45:16-46:18

 

Download

 

This week’s Torah portion covers the first five chapters of the Book of Leviticus, and presents various types of sacrifice to be offered to God in the sanctuary. To an unfamiliar reader, the details may seem antiquated or gruesome, given the references to slaughter, entrails and blood, more akin to a butchery, than to a sacred space. Navigating the text with the expertise of biblical commentators, however, the details begin to take on a cogent shape. As Levine explains, “Chapters 1–5 are addressed to the general populace—to individual Israelites and to their leaders, to all who wished to worship God or who were required by circumstances to offer a particular sacrifice. They tell what may be offered—animals, birds, grain, and so forth—and they lay down the proper procedures for presenting the different sacrifices” (Levine 3). The preliminary rites with the sacrificial animal are performed by the lay offeror: hand-leaning, slaughtering, flaying, quartering, and washing. The priest takes over at the altar and continues the sacrificial ritual (Milgrom 55-56). There are five key types of sacrifice: the burnt offering (ʿolah), the grain offering (minhah), and the sacred gift of greeting (zevaḥ ha-shelamim), sin/reparation offering (hattaʾt) and guilt offering (ʾasham). These offerings served a multiplicity of functions, depending on the type and occasion, including expiation of sins, completion of purification rites, thanksgiving, entreaty, vow fulfillment or spontaneous free-will.

 

We may consider the relevance of these chapters for us today. As Wenham asks, “What do we learn from a study of [Hebrew Bible] ritual?” For me, these chapters convey the importance of ritual as a way of connecting with God. The ancient Israelites – the kohanim (priests) and the lay people – understood that their sacrificial actions were not empty gestures, but were a means to communicate with God and to meet their need for forgiveness and healing, expressing joy and gratitude, and paying homage.

 

These chapters also remind us about ethical values. We may note that the sacrificial laws make special concessions for the underprivileged. As Milgrom comments, “A leitmotif of the sacrificial texts is their concern for the poor: everyone, regardless of means, should be able to bring an acceptable offering to the Lord. Thus, birds were added to the roster of burnt offerings and the pericope on the cereal offering (chap. 2) was deliberately inserted after the burnt offering, implying that if a person could not afford birds he could bring a cereal offering” (51).

 

Finally, these passages are valuable as they offer us rich sacrificial images and terms that resonate throughout the Hebrew Bible. In Isaiah 53, the servant is compared to “a lamb led to slaughter” (Is 53:7) while Jeremiah compares himself to “a gentle lamb led to the slaughter” (11:19). The New Testament too follows this tradition in referring to Jesus as the Lamb of God (John 1:29).

 

The offering of animal sacrifice as a formal act of worship may be inconceivable today. However, these Levitical chapters continue to hold validity and meaning for us by reinforcing the importance of connecting with God, upholding ethical values and providing us with a visual vocabulary of sacrifice.

 

For Reflection and Discussion: Do you agree that ritual and ethics are linked in the Hebrew Bible?

 

Bibliography: Jacob Milgrom, Anchor Bible (NY 1998); Baruch Levine, JPS Torah Commentary (Philadelphia, 2003); Gordon Wenham, “The Perplexing Pentateuch,” Vox Evangelica 17 (1987)

 

This week’s teaching commentary was prepared by

Nidhani De Andrado, Boston, USA, Bat Kol alum 2002/2003

(Email: pdeandrado@yahoo.com)

[Copyright © 2018]

 

……..……………………………………………..……………

PLEASE NOTE: The weekly Parashah commentaries represent the research and creative thought of their authors, and are meant to stimulate deeper thinking about the meaning of the Scriptures. While they draw upon the study methods and sources employed by the Bat Kol Institute, the views and conclusions expressed in these commentaries are solely those of their authors, and do not necessarily represent the views of Bat Kol. The commentaries, along with all materials published on the Bat Kol website, are copyrighted by the writers, and are made available for personal and group study, and local church purposes. Permission needed for other purposes. Questions, comments and feedback are always welcome.

………………………………………………………………………

 

Bat Kol Institute for Jewish Studies, Jerusalem

1983-2018

“Christians Studying the Bible within its Jewish milieu, using Jewish Sources.”

Website: www.batkol.info; Parashah Admin.: gill@batkol.info

The Fourth Sunday of Lent

The Fourth Sunday of Lent – March 11, 2018

2 Chronicles 36: 14-16, 19-23 Ps. 137:1-6 Ephesians 2:4-10 John 3: 14-21

 

Download

 

Today we hear a brief review from the perspective of the Chronicler of the entire history of Israel which begins with Adam and concludes with the declarations of Cyrus the Persian.

 

Through the ages, the priests and leadership often failed to be faithful to G-d and the people followed them. Prophets and messengers were sent to call them back to a G-d who showed compassion and mercy over and over. These voices were often met with mockery and hatred. Some were even killed for bringing this message. Because of the blindness of the Israelites, other rulers dominated them and they lost their homeland, their temple, their lives. In the end those remaining were taken captive to Babylon until finally released to return home some 70 years later by Cyrus the Persian. Ps. 137 reflects the loss and pain they experienced in this dark time caused by their lack of faithfulness. “By the streams of Babylon we sat and wept when we remembered Zion.” It took Cyrus to listen to the prophet Jeremiah and offer the people another chance in their own land. This hope and their return ends the final chapter of “the TaNak,” the Hebrew Bible.

 

Paul’s letter to the Ephesians continues the theme of calling the people to remember the mercy of G-d and to live now in the light by the grace and kindness of Christ Jesus. From the beginning we witness a G-d who has always yearned to be in a loving relationship with each person created. How quick we are to forget this. We are daily reminded in our liturgy to “REMEMBER”…a very Jewish plea.

 

The Gospel of John is explicit in connecting G-d’s Ahavah love for creation and each one of us. From the beginning of creation there has been a movement toward light, truth, goodness. Jesus the Christ is the Light of G-d, the Word made flesh. The connections throughout religious history reflect this love and Jesus becomes human to live our reality and to lead us to a more intimate knowledge of how precious we are to our Creator. Too often we lose our way and choose darkness over light. We are often blinded by false images of “light” – power, money, fame, etc. None of this leads to true peace, freedom of spirit or love that is constant and lasting.

 

So today we are reminded again that no matter the sin, we are continually called to “come back to G-d with all our heart”. We are never forgotten. G-d walks with us through whatever darkness we may face. Each day provides a new beginning for us to be the “face of G-d” to a world so in need of mercy and love. No matter where we live in this world, we are bombarded by the pain and misery of sisters and brothers around us. We are also all connected to one another in many ways. The recent Olympics in South Korea were a great example of the possibility of unity in diversity and appreciation of gifts.

 

We witnessed spectacular moments of LIGHT, HOPE, CREATIVITY and SKILL. Young and old from many nations mingled together in joy and gratitude. If only we could continue this Spirit “ back home.”

 

For reflection: Where do you find prophetic voices around you? Do you take seriously your call to be a prophet by your Baptism? With what is happening here in the USA, I think of the passage from Isaiah 11: 6 ~ And a little child shall lead them. Are the young our prophetic voices today?

 

This week’s teaching commentary was prepared by

Mary Louise Chesley-Cora, MAT in Religious Studies

Hockessin DE USA

Bat Kol Alumna 2001

Email: chezcor@msn.com

[Copyright © 2018]

…………………………………………………………………

PLEASE NOTE: The weekly Gospel commentaries represent the research and creative thought of their authors, and are meant to stimulate deeper thinking about the meaning of the Sunday Scriptures. While they draw upon the study methods and sources employed by the Bat Kol Institute, the views and conclusions expressed in these commentaries are solely those of their authors, and do not necessarily represent the views of Bat Kol. Questions, comments and feedback are always welcome.

………………………………………………………………

 ~~1983-2018~~

Bat Kol Institute for Jewish Studies, Jerusalem

“Christians Studying the Bible within its Jewish milieu, using Jewish Sources.”

Website: www.batkol.info gill@batkol.info

Parashat Vayak’hel-Pekudei

Shabbat Table Talk

Parashat Vayak’hel-Pekudei – Erev Shabbat 9 March 2018

Week of 4 to 10 March 2018

Torah portion: Exodus 35:1-40:38 Haftarah: Ezekiel 36:16-38

 

Download

 

The celebration of Sabbath this week at sundown of Friday is called Shabbat Parah or the “Sabbath of the Red Heifer” in preparation for the Pesach (Passover). The reference for this is Numbers 19:1-22 which describes the red heifer, or parah adumah as part of the purification ritual for the priests and the people. This reading, from the Book of Numbers, is the Torah portion assigned to be read. (www.jewfaq.org)

 

In this commentary, however, I am going to write about Parashat Vayak’hel-Pekudei according to the chronological order of the Torah portions. The general content of Vayak’hel is the recapitulations of the building of the Tabernacle which has already been described in details in the preceding parashiyot. Pekudei contains the inventory of the materials used in the Tabernacle building project. The parashah ends the Book of Exodus. It is a tradition to end the reading with, “Chazak, chazak, v’nitchazek!” (Be strong, be strong and may we be strengthened!)

 

The descriptions in the parashah are quite thorough and detailed. So, in order to imbibe the spirit of the parashah, I would like to use the observations of Rashi, who is known in the Jewish Biblical Studies for his elucidation of the Torah at the level of peshat or the plain meaning of the text. The other author or teacher whom I wish to use is Nehama Leibowitz, a Torah teacher, whose work is equally meticulous.

 

Rashi observed that there is a difference in the sequence of God’s command regarding the Sabbath in Exodus 31:12-17. It began with the command to keep the Sabbath holy, then proceeded to verse 15 saying, “Six days shall work be done, but on the seventh day…” In the parashah that we are reading, it is the reverse. (Herczeg, 488) What does this tell us? The reversal of order is an emphasis given that even creative work as important as the construction of the Mishkan or the Tabernacle cannot overturn the Sabbath commandments.

 

Leibowitz, in the study that she prepared for this parashah, noticed that the recapitulations, when the artists and workers began to report what they had done, were a repetition of the ones already stated previously. While the text could easily say, “it was done as per instruction of Moses,” or something similar, it chose to restate the details again. Using different rabbinic commentaries, the following reasons were posited: it may be because the instructions had to be continually repeated for them to be followed accurately or that it may be the narrative convention of the literature of the time. The latter was the most accepted. Similar to the offering of first fruits and first born, the repetition stressed the symbolic significance of each detail and the dedication of the fruit of each worker’s labors in preparation for life in the Promised Land.

 

The above examples are the works of these admirable scholars whose attention to details led to significant insights. Their dedication to Torah Study can be likened to the dedication of the artisans, like Bezalel and Oholiab, whose work produced a beautiful Tabernacle in the wilderness! Indeed, “God is in the detail.”

 

Reflection and Discussion: 1) How can I develop my attentiveness to the Scriptures? 2) As a Christian, how can the Jewish way of reading the Torah enhance the way I read the Gospel? 3) After finishing each Book of the Torah, we pray, “Chazak, chazak, v’nitchazek!” (Be strong, be strong, may we be strengthened!). What does it mean for you?

 

Bibliography: Herczeg, Rashi: Shemos/ Exodus (Mesorah Publications, New York, 1995); Leibowitz, New Studies in Shemot (Haomanim Press, Jerusalem, 1995)

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This week’s teaching commentary was prepared by

Sr. Petite Lao, RNDM, Bat Kol Alum 2010, 2014

e-mail address: petitelao@gmail.com

[Copyright © 2018]

 

………………………………………………………………………

PLEASE NOTE: The weekly Parashah commentaries represent the research and creative thought of their authors, and are meant to stimulate deeper thinking about the meaning of the Scriptures. While they draw upon the study methods and sources employed by the Bat Kol Institute, the views and conclusions expressed in these commentaries are solely those of their authors, and do not necessarily represent the views of Bat Kol. The commentaries, along with all materials published on the Bat Kol website, are copyrighted by the writers, and are made available for personal and group study, and local church purposes. Permission needed for other purposes. Questions, comments and feedback are always welcome.

………………………………………………………………………

 

Bat Kol Institute for Jewish Studies, Jerusalem

1983-2018

“Christians Studying the Bible within its Jewish milieu, using Jewish Sources.”

Website: www.batkol.info; Parashah Admin: gill@batkol.info

The Third Sunday of Lent

REFLECTIONS ON THE READINGS FOR

THE THIRD SUNDAY OF LENT, 04 March, 2018, CYCLE B

Exodus 20:1-17; Psalm 18:8-11; 1 Corinthians 1:22-25; John 2:13-25

 

Download

 

For the last two Sundays, our readings have recalled God’s covenant with Noah and with Abraham. Today, in our reading from Exodus, we are with God’s people at Sinai, hearing ”the Ten Words”, God’s covenant charter between God and God’s people, whom the Eternal One has redeemed from slavery in Egypt. These Words, accompanied by the sound of thunder and trumpet, are heard for miles around, and are the prime expression of the covenant demands.

 

The part of Psalm 18 which we read today is a hymn in praise of Torah, the Law, given by God to give us life, in which we rejoice, as we try to respond wholeheartedly to it throughout our lives. God’s ”Ten Words” are words which sustain us and so ”are more to be desired than … the purest of gold and are sweeter than the sweetest of imaginable honeys”.

 

Unlike Matthew, Mark and Luke, who place the controversy about the Temple immediately before Jesus’ Passion, John places it at the very beginning of his ministry. It gives us a point of entry for understanding Jesus’ life – and is directly related to the cause of his death. We see here the characteristic Johannine device of having Jesus say something which others only understand at one level, giving John the opportunity of explaining the true meaning, which is on quite another level entirely. The threat of destroying and the promise of rebuilding the Temple was deeply embedded in the early Christian tradition. As was the case with the prophets of the Hebrew scriptures, prophetic actions at the time of Jesus were highly dramatic ways of conveying God’s will and purpose. The deeply significant episode concerning the Temple is related to his prophetic sayings which refer to the crisis and disaster which Jerusalem and the Temple faced. In the early decades of the first century, some Jewish groups did expect that in the ”last days” God would provide a ”new temple”, thus restoring the purity of Israel. While there was certainly an element of protest in the actions of Jesus, they are better understood as a prophetic gesture against the Temple itself. In this context, it is not surprising that Jesus adopted such a radical stance. But his words and actions against the Temple may have been the immediate cause of his downfall. Jesus seems to have expected that in the ”last days”, which he believed to be imminent, the Temple would be destroyed and replaced by a new and perfect Temple, built by God. In the eyes of the Jerusalem Temple establishment, these views were provocative and outrageous. It is hard to overestimate the importance of the Temple for the religious and political life of Jerusalem. Any serious threat to it would have been opposed vigorously both by the Temple authorities and by the local inhabitants of Jerusalem. They are certainly recalled during Jesus’ trial.

 

The words remembered by the disciples, ”Zeal for your house will devour me” are from Psalm 68, which begins, ”Save me, O God, for the waters have risen to my neck”. It is the cry of an innocent sufferer, in deep distress and the reference to it is poignant. The passage from John has a clear reference to Jesus’ death and resurrection, and this is the heart of our reading from Paul’s Letter to the Corinthians today: ”Here are we preaching a crucified Christ”, proof of God’s ”foolishness” being ”wiser than human wisdom”, and God’s ”weakness” being ”stronger than human strength”.

 

This week’s Sunday Gospel Commentary was prepared by

Sr Margaret Shepherd, NDS, London, UK

margaretashepherd@gmail.com

[Copyright © 2018]

 

………………………………………………………………

PLEASE NOTE: The weekly Gospel commentaries represent the research and creative thought of their authors, and are meant to stimulate deeper thinking about the meaning of the Sunday Scriptures. While they draw upon the study methods and sources employed by the Bat Kol Institute, the views and conclusions expressed in these commentaries are solely those of their authors, and do not necessarily represent the views of Bat Kol. Questions, comments and feedback are always welcome.

…………………………………………..…………………

 

Bat Kol Institute for Jewish Studies, Jerusalem

1983-2018

“Christians Studying the Bible within its Jewish milieu, using Jewish Sources.”

gill@batkol.info Website: www.batkol.info

Parashat Ki Tisa

Shabbat Table Talk

Parashah Ki Tisa —Erev Shabbat March 2, 2018

Week of February 25–March 3, 2018

Torah portion: Ex. 30:11–34:35 Haftarah: 1 Kgs. 18 :1–39

 

Download

 

This week’s reading is one of the most dramatic in the whole Hebrew Bible. The opening conserves an idyllic tonality putting us rather backwards, to the previous section, with the detailed explanations concerning ritual laws and norms providing purity of person and that of the future Temple. Thus the goal of these meticulous prescriptions is to enable the sons of Israel (בְּנֵֽי־יִשְׂרָאֵל), i.e. the sanctified people of God, to be testimonies of the Almighty’s self-opening for His holy ones’ sake [cf. Ex. 30:6]. In this sense both the numbering and a ransom for the soul of every man make it clear what kind of relationship binds The Holy One and his servants. The two beautiful metaphors of this complex and profound intimacy are to be found further: 1) the mixed fragrant ointment (שֶׁ֚מֶן) used to consecrate both the sanctuary and the sons of Aaron, and 2) the incense, a sort of the high-qualified, tempered together, pure and holy confected perfume (‎קְטֹ֔רֶת). The variety of those symbolic names and images renders with an excellent brightness how the extreme exclusiveness of the being apart from (it is the principal meaning of the term קֹ֖דֶשׁ) delimits the Revelation of the Lord and his perception from the point of view of His people. However this ideal picture tout court fails from the very beginning without even being performed in the mind of the attentive reader of the Biblical narrative.

 

The Golden Calf story strikes us by its hardness and unexpectedness. Its central place in this section is striking too, as if there were a counterpart of the giving of the tablets of Decalogue. In fact, we have to do with an agile narrative construction that puts forward the salvific dynamism of God’s Self-Revealing on Mount Sinai by using an antithetical language: first, Moses receives the tablets of Divine origin, then comes the tragedy of idolatry and finally, he makes by himself the new tablets after having destroyed the former ones. This intense antithetical polarity intertwined in itself – ad intra [the drama of Israel] & ad extra [the drama of the whole universe inscribed in the Divine Law as Rashi says] –, in the history of Christianity, was practically used and overused in order to discredit validity and distinctiveness of the First Testament. Especially in the Epistle of Barnabas this antagonistic attitude is exalted to an extreme point, so that his author may affirm: “when they turned to idols, they lost it (the covenant)” [Barn. 4:6c-7]. Similarly, in the Second Epistle to Corinthians [3:12–18] St. Paul seems to present rather a conflicting model of the relationship between the two Testaments and two nations: the veil of Moses is regarded as an obstacle for Israelites to see the divine glory. The coming of Christ removes it from the panorama of salvation, making of Christians a new Israel, the truly one who substitutes the ancient people of the ancient Covenant now completely broken.

 

The answer to such a challenging quest can be deduced from the biblical story itself. At the very end of the Parashah we are taught a lot of significant details that shed a light on the issue. The shining brilliance of the Moses’ face (as well as the veil!) focuses one’s attention on the divine dialectic or dialogical unity of the revelation and hiding, mercy and punishment, immanence and transcendence. Consequently, the turning point of the whole narrative lays on this divine choice, election that cannot all of a sudden be reduced or diminished by human will. Hence it is comprehensible why the mediation of Moses as a redeemer reached so quickly the Divine hesed (חסד), why Moses himself revives – in an impressive manner in this story – a partnership of a mystical betrothal that still binds people of Israel as Sion, Daughter of a Voice, to His Beloved Bridegroom [cf. Hos. 2:19].

 

The second reading with another impressive narrative profile of Elijah, irreprehensible in his prophetic zeal, functions as a perfect conclusion to the majestic story of the renewal of the unique Covenant pulsing in the heart of the whole of humanity. The triumph of the Lord over the false gods symbolized by two calves in the present Torah portion has to be proclaimed as the Prophet does (1 Kgs. 18:36ss.) inviting to this outstanding prayer heaven and earth [cf. Ps. 148]. From the point of view of pragmatics this final “The Eternal alone is God!” proclaimed twice echoes to a large extent in the previous and following sections stressing such a great need of dialogue in a modern time: a dialectics that opens mind and heart of everyone but mostly manifests a Divine Imperative to be attentive to a Voice that surrounds us, to hear It, to transmit It, to revive continually Its fullness and surprising presence.

 

For Reflection and Discussion: 1. What kind of spiritual experience may suppose the shining face of Moses? Which other biblical texts revive these prominent “light” metaphors? 2. What are my real challenges and successes in this Lent’ season to keep unbroken a Covenant with God? 3. How are tensions of Divine Revelation realized in my life?

 

Bibliography: Plaut, ed., The Torah, A Modern Commentary (New York, 1981); Grilli, Quale rapporto tra i due Testamenti? Riflessione critica sui modelli ermeneutici classici concernenti l’unità delle Scritture (Bologna, 2007); Fritz, “Sabbath Rest and Sunday Worship: We Are Entitled to Both”. P. 38–52 Available on this link.

 

This week’s teaching commentary was prepared by

Philopheus Artyushin, Moscow Theol. Academy, Doctorate in Biblical Theology,

Bat Kol alumnus 2011 artyushins@yandex.ru [Copyright © 2018]

 

……………………………………………………………

PLEASE NOTE: The weekly Parashah commentaries represent the research and creative thought of their authors, and are meant to stimulate deeper thinking about the meaning of the Scriptures. While they draw upon the study methods and sources employed by the Bat Kol Institute, the views and conclusions expressed in these commentaries are solely those of their authors, and do not necessarily represent the views of Bat Kol. The commentaries, along with all materials published on the Bat Kol website, are copyrighted by the writers, and are made available for personal and group study, and local church purposes. Permission needed for other purposes. Questions, comments and feedback are always welcome.

……………………………………………………………

 

Bat Kol Institute for Jewish Studies, Jerusalem, 1983-2018

“Christians Studying the Bible within its Jewish milieu, using Jewish Sources.”

Website: www.batkol.info; Parashat Admin: gill@batkol.info

Second Sunday of Lent

Second Sunday of Lent Year B (25 February 2018)

Gen. 22:1-2, 9a, 10-13, 15-18; Ps. 116:10, 15-19; Rom. 8:31b-34; Mark 9:2-10

Theme: Listen to Him

 

Download

 

Mark has placed his transfiguration story in the very center of his Gospel. It is part of the middle section, the story of Jesus and his disciples on “The Way” from Galilee to Jerusalem [Mk 8:22-10:52]. This section includes three passion predictions and represents a major turning point in the Gospel. The transfiguration story, in some sense a preview of the resurrection, emphasizes “God’s creative, transforming, transfiguring power to restore life” [Sabin, 97].

 

The story is replete with Old Testament echoes: six days, mountain, dazzling white, Elijah, Moses, dwellings, being terrified, cloud and voice. It is firmly anchored in Israel’s scriptures and particularly in stories about Mt Sinai (Horeb).

 

Bright light is a symbol of God’s presence. The coming of God on Mt Sinai is accompanied by lightning [Ex 19:16], and Moses’ face shines after speaking with God [Ex 34:29]. In some Jewish mystical literature angels are bathed in light: “The angel had in its hand a shining robe, which gave off a light as pure and bright as the angel’s” [Schwartz, 141]. Mark says that Jesus’ clothes became “glistening, intensely white” (RSV) or “dazzling white” (NAB), “such as no gnapheus on earth could bleach them”. The Greek gnapheus means ‘fuller’, whose job it was to whiten raw wool and tease it out (or ‘full’ it) to prepare it for spinning. Because the word is not in common use today many translations have ‘such as no one or no launderer …’ The color white symbolizes heaven so Jesus’ clothes are an external manifestation of his identity. White is also a sign of joy and feasting.

 

The dwellings (also translated shelters, booths, tents or tabernacles) that Peter wants to build in v.5 recall the annual Feast of Tabernacles that commemorated the past event of the exodus, but also looked forward to the time of the Messiah [Zc 14:16] that would be a time of joy and feasting when “every cooking pot…shall be sacred to the Lord of hosts”[Zc 14:21]. Peter’s suggestion seems to be that this is such a good experience let’s make it permanent. However this is not Jesus’ idea, as the following story of going down the mountain to heal the epileptic boy shows. There is still work to do.

 

The word ‘cloud’ (Heb arafel) appears nearly 50 times in the Five Books of Moses as a symbol for the presence of the Lord. The voice from the cloud proclaims “This is my Son, the Beloved”. Brendan Byrne sees the whole of Mark’s Gospel resting as it were on three pillars, three statements that Jesus is God’s Son: near the beginning (at the baptism in 1:11), in the middle (9:7), and towards the end (by the Roman centurion at the crucifixion in 15:39). The Hebrew scriptures are convinced that God communicates with us and this conviction carries through into the Talmud: “R. Abba says it is the divine voice as it has been taught: After the later prophets Haggai, Zechariah, and Malachi had died, the Holy Spirit departed from Israel, but they still availed themselves of the Bat Kol” [Sotah 9b]. The voice continues “Listen to him”, something that Peter and the disciples had obviously not been doing. Finally, they find there is no one else with them “but only Jesus”. Do they need anyone else?

 

For Reflection and Discussion: 1. Have you experienced anything you would describe as a ‘mountain-top’ experience? What effect did it have on you? 2. What might “listening to Jesus” mean for you? 3. Where do you think the Bat Kol is heard today? 4. Is Jesus enough for you?

 

Bibliography: Byrne, A Costly Freedom (Strathfield NSW, 2008); Sabin, ‘The Gospel According to Mark’ in Durken, New Collegeville Bible Commentary (Collegeville MN, 2009); Schwartz, Gabriel’s Palace: Jewish mystical tales (Oxford, 1993).

 

This week’s Sunday Gospel Commentary was prepared by

Br Kevin McDonnell cfc, PhD., Australia, Bat Kol Alumnus, 2003, 2004, 2005.
Email address: klmcdonnell@edmundrice.org

[Copyright © 2018]

 

……………………………………………………………..

PLEASE NOTE: The weekly Gospel commentaries represent the research and creative thought of their authors, and are meant to stimulate deeper thinking about the meaning of the Sunday Scriptures. While they draw upon the study methods and sources employed by the Bat Kol Institute, the views and conclusions expressed in these commentaries are solely those of their authors, and do not necessarily represent the views of Bat Kol. Questions, comments and feedback are always welcome.

……………………………………………………………

 

Bat Kol Institute for Jewish Studies, Jerusalem

1983-2018

“Christians Studying the Bible within its Jewish milieu, using Jewish Sources.

gill@batkol.info Website: www.batkol.info