Parashat Miketz

Shabbat Table Talk

Parashat  Miketz,   Erev Shabbat, 15th of December, 2017

Week of  10th – 16th December

Torah portion:  Gn. 41:1-44:1            Haftarah: Zec. 2:1-4,7

Download

 

Perhaps the most well known Bible story that we had heard as young children is the Joseph story. The firstborn son of Rachel and Jacob, Joseph was favored by his father more than the other children in the family. Joseph was a self-centered and arrogant youth who told of his dreams in a manner that antagonized others. His immature spontaneity created great tension and conflict among his brothers. The unspeakable crime which the brothers committed was not proportionate in relation to Joseph’s actions. They had gravely sinned before God.

 

Joseph, mistreated so cruelly was in every sense a victim. Enraged, vengeful and dwelling in self-pity would have been an understandable reaction especially since it was family members who had committed this crime. We know little of Joseph’s initial reaction for the story only informs us of the life of Joseph some 20 years later.

 

In many respects Joseph’s numerous trials reflect a life very much like his father, Jacob. For Jacob, having usurped his brother’s birthright endured many ordeals living under Laban and probably the most excruciating pain was when he went to meet his twin brother, Esau for he feared for his life. Father and son, it seems experienced that the deepest crises of their lives turned out to be moments when they experienced the deepest truths and acquired greater strength.

 

Joseph’s release from prison came about due to his unique skill in interpreting dreams. So impressed was Pharaoh, (Gn.41:38) that Joseph was then made viceroy of Egypt, second only to Pharaoh. It seems that Joseph instead of passively resigning himself or complaining about his circumstances, creatively sought to serve wherever he was.  

 

Due to a severe famine, Jacob’s sons went down to Egypt. Joseph, in his high position and dressed in Egyptian dress, met his brothers whom he recognized immediately.  This is radically different from their last encounter for now the roles are reversed, Joseph is in control. He knows what they do not. He puts them to the test to see if they had changed over the years. Joseph reenacts his brother’s mistreatment of him with them now as the victims. Experiencing these false accusations and helpless to rectify the situation, the brothers recalled their mistreatment of their brother. It was Rueben who spoke up and said to them, “Did I not tell you, ‘Do no wrong to the boy? But you paid no heed. Now comes the reckoning for his blood.” (Gn.42:22)

 

Joseph’s testing of them did not emerge out of revenge but rather was intended for the brother’s benefit. It was Judah’s humble petition (Gn. 44:32-34) that confirmed for Joseph that the brothers had changed in their hearts and Joseph could no longer control his desire to be reconciled with them. It was God’s hidden plan that was operative at each stage of his journey. Joseph had personally being supported in every situation.

 

It is not a coincidence that the story of Joseph is read during the celebration of Hanukkah because the theme of oppression and God’s deliverance are present in both. Joseph was a prisoner who through a marvelous series of events became the ruler of Egypt. “What can be learned from this parashat, to prepare ourselves in good days, days in which holiness is revealed, to set the light in our hearts, to be there in times when holiness seems far off.” (Etz Hayim, 250)

 

For Reflection and Discussion: [1.] Joseph truly was ‘his brothers’ keeper;what can we learn from his life? [2.] How can we maintain faith and trust in God when wronged and unjustly accused? [3.] We need to remember that we can be both perpetrator and victim.

 

Bibliography: Etz Hayim, Torah and Commentary (New York, 2001); Nehama Liebowitz, New Studies in Bereshit Genesis (Haomanim Press, Jerusalem)

 

This week’s teaching commentary was prepared by

Rita Kammermayer, nds, B.A, B.Ed, Masters of Pastoral Studies, Jerusalem

Bat Kol alumni/2001

ritakammermayer@netscape.net

[Copyright © 2017]

 

………………………………………………………………………

PLEASE NOTE: The weekly Parashah commentaries represent the research and creative thought of their authors, and are meant to stimulate deeper thinking about the meaning of the Scriptures. While they draw upon the study methods and sources employed by the Bat Kol Institute, the views and conclusions expressed in these commentaries are solely those of their authors, and do not necessarily represent the views of Bat Kol.   The commentaries, along with all materials published on the Bat Kol website, are copyrighted by the writers, and are made available for personal and group study, and local church purposes. Permission needed for other purposes.  Questions, comments and feedback are always welcome.

………………………………………………………………….

 

1983-2017

Bat Kol Institute for Jewish Studies, Jerusalem

    “Christians Studying the Bible within its Jewish milieu, using Jewish Sources.

Website: www.batkol.info Commentary Admin: gill@batkol.info

Second Sunday of Advent

Second Sunday of Advent Year B (10 December 2017)

Isaiah 40:1-5, 9-11; Psalm 85:9-14; 2 Peter 3:8-14; Mark 1:1-8.

  Theme: Prepare the Way of the Lord

 

Download

 

The first words of Mark’s Gospel in nearly all English versions are “The beginning…”, e.g. in NRSV, “The beginning of the good news of Jesus Christ, the Son of God” [1:1]. However the Greek text does not include the word “The” and reads “Beginning of the good news…” There is no verb in this first verse so it is now regarded by many scholars as the title for the book rather than its introductory statement [Boring, 29-32]. The implications are profound if it is the whole book, not just the first verse, that is the beginning of the Good News. The whole Gospel is just the beginning of something much greater!

 

Mark immediately grounds his story of Jesus firmly in the Hebrew scriptures with a quotation from “the prophet Isaiah”. The quotation is actually a composite one, the first part from Malachi and the second from Isaiah. Malachi 3:1a, “See, I am sending my messenger to prepare the way before me”, is the voice of YHWH promising to visit his people. But Mark has changed the quotation to “See, I am sending my messenger ahead of you”, as a reference to John the Baptizer coming ahead of Jesus. John the Baptizer is seen as an Elijah-like figure, dressed as Elijah was in a garment of hair and a leather belt [2 Kings 1:8], and calling all to prepare for the coming of the Lord [cf. Isaiah 40:3]. Mark is presenting Jesus as the fulfillment of Israel’s deepest hopes and dreams.

 

The “Lord” who is coming in Isaiah 40:3 is YHWH, but in Mark the “Lord” probably refers to Jesus [cf. 5:19; see Hurtado 15-16, 23-24]. Isaiah 40:4 goes on to specify what needs to be done in the wilderness, the lifting up of every valley and the levelling off of every mountain and hill. Is it the obstacles in the wilderness of our lives that need to be smoothed out so that the Lord can come to us?

 

Most English versions have John proclaiming a “baptism of repentance” but the Greek word metanoia in 1:4 implies much more than “repentance”. John is calling people to a radical change of mind and heart; he is calling them to abandon their current world-view and adopt a completely new one. The rest of Mark’s Gospel spells out the radical and counter-cultural nature of the world-view proclaimed by Jesus.

 

John’s last words about Jesus are that he will “baptize you with the Holy Spirit”. Marc Bregman has explored the rich Jewish tradition of the “Holy Spirit”, Rua Ha-Qodesh, the breath, or spirit, of the Holy One, and its evocation of the first creation story in Genesis. He points out that in rabbinic literature the primary meaning of Rua Ha-Qodesh is as the source of prophetic inspiration [see commentary on Deuteronomy 18:18 in Midrash Sefre Devarim 176, https://www.sefaria.org/Sifrei_Devarim.176?lang=bi]. In addition he draws attention to the stream of rabbinic interpretation beginning with Hillel that accepts the wide accessibility of the Holy Spirit to all people of good will, an approach developed in later Christian thinking.

 

For Reflection and Discussion: 1. If the whole of Mark’s story of Jesus is just the “beginning of the good news” where might we find its continuation? 2. What might be some of the mountains that need levelling and valleys that need filling in our society today? 3. What does it mean for you to be baptized with the Holy Spirit?

 

Bibliography: Boring, Mark (Louisville KT, 2006); Bregman, The Holy Spirit in Judaism (Unpublished, 2009); Hurtado, New International Bible Commentary: Mark (Peabody MA, 1989).

 

This week’s Sunday Gospel Commentary was prepared by

Br Kevin McDonnell cfc, PhD., Australia. Bat Kol Alumnus, 2003, 2004, 2005.
Email address:
klmcdonnell@edmundrice.org

 

[Copyright © 2017]

 

…………………………………………………

PLEASE NOTE: The weekly Gospel commentaries represent the research and creative thought of their authors, and are meant to stimulate deeper thinking about the meaning of the Sunday Scriptures. While they draw upon the study methods and sources employed by the Bat Kol Institute, the views and conclusions expressed in these commentaries are solely those of their authors, and do not necessarily represent the views of Bat Kol.  Questions, comments and feedback are always welcome.

……………………………………………………

 

Bat Kol Institute for Jewish Studies, Jerusalem

1983-2017

“Christians Studying the Bible  within its Jewish milieu, using Jewish Sources.”

 

Parashat Vayeishev

Shabbat Table Talk

Parashat Vayeishev 8th December 2017

Week of December 3-9 December, 2017
Torah portion: Genesis 37:1 – 40:23        Haftarah: Amos 2:6–3:8

 

Download

 

It is interesting to note that the parashah is entitled Va-yeishev “And Jacob settled,” (Gen 37:1). In fact, it recounts a string of unsettling stories of relationships: brothers against a parent and brother (Gen 37:1-36), in-laws at odds with each other (38:1-30), masters manipulating their servants (Gen 39:1-23). The similarities are unnerving: characters dismiss, take advantage of, deceive or even contemplate murdering those related to them, be it their brother, their father, a relative, or servant.

 

It is unsettling to read that the sons of Jacob, out of anger and jealousy, contemplate on killing their brother Joseph. It is still problematic that even after Reuben diverted their decision from murder into throwing him into a pit, they sold their brother for twenty pieces of silver and even lied through their teeth to their father to cover up their misdeed. It seems now that the value of their brother is amounting to no less than the price of a slave, a thing, a person meant to be treated as mere property.

 

Joseph’s story is interrupted by another problematic relationship, that of Judah and Tamar. It is curious that Judah never recognized Tamar when he met her at Enaim and mistook her for a prostitute (Gen. 38:14-15). Brenner, in Torah Women’s Commentary, observes: “Ironically, Judah sees Tamar only when she was covered…that Judah does not recognize Tamar despite the veil – or at least by her voice when they negotiate- is a measure of his eager state. It may also signal a lack of familiarity with his daughter-in-law” [Brenner]. In Haftarah Women’s Commentary, Rabbi Person asks, “was she invisible to him as a person and now visible as a mere sex object, having never known her?” [Person].

 

Amos, in the haftarah, cries out against the sins of Israel who “sell the just man for silver and poor for a pair of sandals” (Amos 2:6); while “father and son go to the same girl” (Amos 2:7) indicating the corrupt and immoral practices committed by Israelites. “These similarities suggest that Amos not only rebuked his contemporaries for their immoral practices but also alluded to the grave sin of their ancestors in patriarchal times” [Etz Hayim]. It seems that it was easy for these characters to dismiss or abuse others. Why so?

 

It is easy to objectify somebody only when their value becomes mere instrumental. It is similar to a coin or currency we use. We assign values to them, sometimes more but oftentimes lesser than the true value of the coin or currency. We take for granted the real value of the minerals/materials used in minting them, thus they become valuable for us only because of the value we assign to them, valuable because we use them. Analogically, we do the same with people. Sometimes we fail to see the inherent value of people apart from their value-for-us, thus, they only become valuable, become persons, when they are useful for us. People now become objects. Not people whom we must respect, love for who they are; not people whose persons must be encountered with. In Buber’s construal, the Thou has become an It. In our world today, women still suffer from objectification; workers are seen as mere objects of production at the workplace, the poor, dismissed as things that get in the way of progress, and migrants scorned as burden. Amos’s indictment against Israel may as well be read as an accusation to our present situation where objectification of people has become ordinary.

 

Reflection and Discussion: 1. How have I been treating people? Do I see them as persons? 2. How do we, as a society, treat the other? 3 What gets in the way of my seeing other people’s inherent value?

 

Bibliography: Plaut (ed.), The Torah, Modern Commentary (UAHC New York 1981); Eskenazi (ed.), The Torah, A Women’s Commentary (URJ Press and WRJ New York, 2008); Goldstein (ed.), The Women’s Haftarah Commentary (Jewish Lights Publishing, 2008); Etz Hayim: Torah and Commentary (The Rabbinical Assembly New York, 2001).

 

This week’s teaching commentary was prepared by

John Paul A. Bolano, PhD student, Ateneo de Manila University, Philippines, Bat Kol 2017

E-mail: jbolano@ateneo.edu

[Copyright © 2017]

 

………………………………………………………………

PLEASE NOTE: The weekly Parashah commentaries represent the research and creative thought of their authors, and are meant to stimulate deeper thinking about the meaning of the Scriptures. While they draw upon the study methods and sources employed by the Bat Kol Institute, the views and conclusions expressed in these commentaries are solely those of their authors, and do not necessarily represent the views of Bat Kol. The commentaries, along with all materials published on the Bat Kol website, are copyrighted by the writers, and are made available for personal and group study, and local church purposes. Permission needed for other purposes. Questions, comments and feedback are always welcome.

………………………………………………………………

 

Bat Kol Institute for Jewish Studies, Jerusalem 1983-2017

“Christians studying the Bible within its Jewish milieu, using Jewish Sources.”

Website: www.batkol.info; Parashah Admin: gill@batkol.info